Sandy Alderson Interview
People wanted me to give a summary of the Alderson interview today so here it is. There was a lot more but this was only a summary of an hour long interview.
I was kind of zoning in and out but this is what I remember:
- Sandy is not mad at Jake for discussing the stuff he did
- Jake gave Sandy a heads up about what he had said before it got relseased; Sandy wasnt mad
- There is no 'right' time to talk about contracts
- Mexico brings the Padres no revenue
- The payroll will increase to $70 mil by the end of the year
- Now is not the time to extend Jake but it is not out of the question
- Seattle's TV revenue is 6 times that of the Padres (thats why they can sign Ichiro. He said this because people are asking "Why can Seattle sign Ichiro but the Padres cant sig Jake?" Becasue Seattle and SD are kinda similar
- Alderson has won a Championship before on a team that did not have the biggest payroll
- The Padres payroll is like 26 in the rankings
- Moores just gave the Padres $14 million CASH.. and will give $2 million more
- Smaller contracts are better
- Giants with Zito and Bonds are almost burdened by the large contracts
- Jake timing wont hurt the mood of the clubhouse
- "If we dont have a good team, if we dont have a good product, then we dont have good customers" -Alderson
- Big people bring big revenue (uhh...Jake?)
- Padres have very loyal fans but they need to remember we are not in the same market as NY and Boston. But he will try to give us the best.
- Love to have a higher run producing lineup
- There is no one in this market more eager to make change (ie: attain new people)
- Someone came on the phone questioning, just like Jake, the managements eagerness to win a championship. They mentioned competitiveness and how in 98 we were promised being really competitive and how we havent gotten it
- Sandy is a little disappointed with the last two years because we didnt win the championship but is proud of how far they came
- Marcus is still on the team because he plays good defense. There is a commitment to the chemistry of the team, he is good for it I guess. Marcus can still be productive.
- Ahead 100,000 in atttendance this year
- Lost money since moving to Petco because of the interest and debt from Qualcomm
- Khalil's personality hasn't change and is appealing to fans
- They take fans interest into account when making deals
- Khalil at shortshop is excellent
- If people think they are gonna be in the market for a $130 million dollar player, they are mistaken. No way.
- If the Cubs think that signing Soriano and Zambrano for that kinda money will win them their first world series since the American Revolution, maybe thats why they havent won a WS.
- The payroll for the Padres wont be up to $130 million anytime soon but it is not out of the question
In the beginning he was kind of arrogant and aggrivated but cooled down in the end.
This FanPost was written by a member of the Gaslamp Ball community and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Gaslamp Ball managers or SB Nation.
0 recs |
87 comments
Comments
Glad to see that publicly
by Phantom on Aug 20, 2007 6:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Good job, pgfl44!
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 20, 2007 6:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Awesome job, padregirlforlife44!
Are you 100% sure he said Mexico brings the Padres "no revenue"?
by Drama on Aug 20, 2007 6:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah
by padparazzi on Aug 20, 2007 7:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How can he say that???
by Drama on Aug 20, 2007 8:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i felt the same way
by padparazzi on Aug 20, 2007 8:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think Sandy is mistaken
I go to games with people who live in Mexico.
They buy tickets.
heck, I go to games with a couple of friends who have a block of 8 full season ticket in Toyota Terrace.
A man from TJ owns 13 full seasons tickets in the seat directly behind home plate...at $250 a pop plus the buy in fee.
Adrian Gonzalez dad, David, PURCHASES his his ticket for the games he goes to.
Sandy, that is revenue.
by B Dizzle on Aug 20, 2007 8:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think sandy should had specified
by padparazzi on Aug 20, 2007 8:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I remember
Sorry I forgot to mention that.
by padresgirlforlife44 on Aug 20, 2007 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah... i think you're right
don't worry about it shayna, you did a great job with the summary!
by padparazzi on Aug 20, 2007 8:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, yeah
by la padres on Aug 21, 2007 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks so much!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Aug 20, 2007 7:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Even better!
by Drama on Aug 20, 2007 7:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brew Crew just added a field goal!
by Drama on Aug 20, 2007 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
awesome job shayna!!!
your summary was great! you remember a lot more stuff than i do!
two thumbs up for shayna!!
by padparazzi on Aug 20, 2007 7:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm picturing
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 20, 2007 8:04 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking the same thing...
Please let my daughter be doing the same thing when she's 17...PLEASE.
by Drama on Aug 20, 2007 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahaha
by padparazzi on Aug 20, 2007 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Giggity!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Aug 20, 2007 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait...me?
"Hello, and welcome to another edition of Midnight Q. Tonight we're gonna enjoy some jazz from Charles Mingus. Norman Maylor's here to read an excerpt from his latest work. And we also have a girl from Omaha hiding a banana. We're gonna find out where. Giggity giggity. Giggity goo. Stick around."
by Drama on Aug 20, 2007 8:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh ok.
Quagmire: Hey there sweetie, how old are you?
Connie: 16.
Quagmire: 18? You're first.
Connie: Mom!
Quagmire: I like where this is goin'! Giggidy, giggidy, gig-gi-dy!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Aug 20, 2007 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"You must be a parking ticket...
by Drama on Aug 20, 2007 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You guys are hilarious
ANYWAYSSS. I was actually typing it into the diary as I heard it. I can type a lot faster than I can write. But Im glad you all enjoyed it.
2 months exactly till the 18 year old club! YEAHHH baby.
PS: I am going to be an elementary school teacher so a bun with a pencil in my hair is in my future!
by padresgirlforlife44 on Aug 20, 2007 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pencil in the hair....
by Drama on Aug 20, 2007 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like I told pgfl44,
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 20, 2007 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So...
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 20, 2007 8:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, Sandy said
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 20, 2007 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Payroll
- Greg Maddux 10,000,000
- Brian Giles 9,666,667
- Trevor Hoffman 7,000,000
- Mike Cameron 7,000,000
- Jake Peavy 4,750,000
- Michael Barrett 4,533,333
- Morgan Ensberg 4,350,000
- Milton Bradley 4,000,000
- Marcus Giles 3,250,000
- Rob Mackowiak 2,750,000
- Khalil Greene 2,250,000
- Josh Bard 1,050,000
- Geoff Blum 900,000
- Adrian Gonzalez 625,000
- Chris Young 600,000
- Doug Brocail 500,000
- Wilfredo Ledezma 415,000
- Clay Hensley 392,000
- Terrmel Sledge 390,000
- Scott Hairston 389,000
- Cla Meredith 387,000
- Heath Bell 385,500
- Kevin Kouzmanoff 380,800
- Kevin Cameron 380,000
70 Million would put us up near the Minesota Twins and Milwaukee Brewers. Doesn't make you think mega bucks teams does it? Some of our current players salaries may be increasing next year as many do, I'm not sure which if any. Some of our best players have the lowest salaries. But they will be using any extra money to sign a new center fielder because as much as I want Mike Cameron to come back I don't think that is going to happen. I'm thinking Aaron Rowand is going to be patroling CF for the Padres next season.
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Aug 20, 2007 9:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aaron Rowand
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 20, 2007 9:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Barrett should
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 20, 2007 9:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is no extra 12 million dollars....
by planetjeffy on Aug 21, 2007 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aha.
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 21, 2007 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brewers vs. D-Backs
by Drama on Aug 20, 2007 9:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
THREE AND A HALF, BABY!!!
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 20, 2007 9:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
D-Backs!!
by Drama on Aug 20, 2007 9:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
There are
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 20, 2007 9:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Personally,
by JBro12 on Aug 20, 2007 9:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you sure?
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 20, 2007 9:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shit. my bad
http://www.chicksdigthelongball.org/
look on the right hand side near the top
by JBro12 on Aug 20, 2007 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Craig Cousell
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Aug 20, 2007 9:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's the beauty
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 20, 2007 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
re #7
by BD on Aug 20, 2007 9:23 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
sorry to replay to my own post, but...
by BD on Aug 20, 2007 9:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
by padresgirlforlife44 on Aug 20, 2007 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
couple things
In 2010, the Padres will have full control of their TV (or as much as they can similar to Petco Park), and the baseball revenue will increase, thereby creating an increase in the payroll... At least that's the plan.
by Dex on Aug 21, 2007 5:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
do u think....
by la padres on Aug 21, 2007 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Typical friggin D-backs
by Phantom on Aug 20, 2007 9:31 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Its good to know
This diary turned out to be quite entertaining I must say.
by padresgirlforlife44 on Aug 20, 2007 9:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
True, true.
I was afraid this place would be like a ghosttown as it has been on previous off-days.
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 20, 2007 9:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
MONEY
the fact of the matter is that bad decisions by the padres in the past have put them in a shitty position with money. it's the equivolent of signing Soriano and Zambrano to huge deals and then 3 years later having both players go down with career-ending injuries.
they don't have the money to pay for their past mistakes and risk new ones, i get it. but what about buying out the Cox cable contract and allowing every non-Cox subscriber in San Diego to view the games. then possibly even trying to market the team to L.A. and Anaheim to pick up a little larger fanbase. our team (and fans) are drastically different than the L.A. teams and may attract people who are unhappy with their choices up there.
then take out a loan and pay off the interest on Qualcomm. or cut a deal with the Chargers that the Padres will buy any remaining seats in the stadium for the next 5 years to ensure all home games are televised at home.
it's the losers way of thinking to sit on your hands and go "well, we screwed up in the past, so we should probably lock ourselves in the closet here and wait until those errors go away before we take any chances again." the way management handles money on this team really pisses me off sometimes.
by John (obviousman) on Aug 21, 2007 5:07 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
fairweathers
From what I understand of the Cox Cable deal, it's a lock. There's no buying it out because Cox won't sell. It's a cash cow for them now and it was a big gamble for Cox early on since they basically rescued the Padres and, from what I gather, took a loss early on. Nobody's lending any money to anybody in San Diego because the city itself is so effed up with crooked politicians and voters who can't agree on direction.
I think the best learning experience the Padres had was actually not to pay ridiculous amounts of money for players just because they had a couple good seasons. They've been burned by too many long term contracts and have had too much success turning castoffs into major leaguers.
by Dex on Aug 21, 2007 5:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
okay
by BD on Aug 21, 2007 7:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Dumb decision vs. Smart decision"
"Despite three last-place finishes, the Mariners continue to be a big draw. The club's cable rating of 6.5 in 2006 ranked fifth among baseball local markets. In 2005, a 6.3 rating was fourth. In 2004, a 7.8 ranked third. For three years before that, the Mariners were No. 1 among all major league local markets."
Another part of them getting a good TV deal at the outset was just based on great timing. In 2000, they signed a 10-year deal with FSN for $288 million. In March of this year, they signed an extension with FSN that will run through 2020 for $300 million. The original deal in 2000 was way overbid because at the time of negotiations, Paul Allen (co-founder of Microsoft) and a partner were considering launching cable regional sports networks. The extension in March was based on ratings.
I don't need to defend Dex here, because he can easily do that himself. But the fact is Larry Lucchino put the best media package together that he could based on dealing from a position of very little strength.
Just a side note - I'm pretty sure the deal with the Padres and Cox runs through the 2011 season.
by Drama on Aug 21, 2007 7:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But
Man I'm so sick of peoplpe constantly lambasting our FO. We do damn well, DAMN WELL, for as little money as we have. Whenever people think poorly about this FO, they should really look at Pittsburgh/Tampa Bay/KC/Baltimore. Then you'd really get a good sense of how crappy things can be.
Dex and Drama, thanks for giving some context to the TV deal. Thanks for doing some research and posting logically before flying off the handle at the management.
by Phantom on Aug 21, 2007 8:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait wait wait
I remember when I was little my dad had to pay something seperate to be able to get Channel 4 but I thought that changed. No?
I have Time Warner, why can I see the games?
Also, I wish someone from the Padres front office would read this, there are some excellent ideas. Especially the one about expanding the market to LA and Anaheim where there are definitely Padres fans. Not that they would listen to us but thats besides the point.
by padresgirlforlife44 on Aug 21, 2007 10:52 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
yes and no
i have time warner also and personally if i could, i'd choose cox over them any day of the week.
by freelunch on Aug 21, 2007 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
by the way
it's much appreciated :D
by freelunch on Aug 21, 2007 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Downloadable
http://www.xxsportsradio.com/component/option,com_remository/Itemid,56/func,select/id,42/
by reddenedbeard on Aug 21, 2007 11:33 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Listening to it now.
by Drama on Aug 21, 2007 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats exactly what I thought
by padresgirlforlife44 on Aug 21, 2007 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sandy
Remember at the beginning of this month when the Barry Bonds Homerun Chase came to Petco? MLB.com reporter Barry Bloom asked John Moores about the crowds and Moores said this:
"I noticed," John Moores, the Padres' majority owner, told MLB.com during the course of his team's 4-3, 10-inning victory. "We need to go out and get a big-name player to give this franchise some financial stability."
When Darren and Billy asked him what that meant, Sandy claimed that Moores was kidding and didn't mean it at all. That he was basically just bullshitting.
Seriously? We're supposed to believe that?
Here's the link to the original article. Does anyone else read it that way? Because I don't.
by Drama on Aug 21, 2007 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Billy the problem?
by reddenedbeard on Aug 21, 2007 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not at all.
by Drama on Aug 21, 2007 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I completely disagree
I think that he gets irked that people assume they know more about baseball than he does.
by Phantom on Aug 21, 2007 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Case in point
Also, please check out this table at Ducksnorts. We clearly have been producing a quality product lately: http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2007/08/why-bother.html
by Phantom on Aug 21, 2007 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Phantom
And when he got into his big speech about Moores presonally writing a check to the club for $14 million Darren told him he didn't think the casual fan, or him for that matter, really understood what exactly that meant. Sandy's dick response was: "What part of "personally wrote a check" don't you understand?"
by Drama on Aug 21, 2007 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Value of the franchise...
by planetjeffy on Aug 21, 2007 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Moores:
by Drama on Aug 21, 2007 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought he was pretty respectful
As for the dodging of questions regarding the club's value, there are two things to consider here:
- Sandy wasn't here when we moved into Petco. He wasn't here before that. Although he's probably seen the numbers, he doesn't have first hand experience relating to the club's financial success before and after the move to Petco.
- Sandy's job isn't to assess the financial viability of the Padres (at least as I understand his role, I could be completely wrong on this). His job is to produce a product that puts butts in seats. Is it his job to know how much the club is worth? How do you asses that?
by Phantom on Aug 21, 2007 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Phantom
But as far as the value of the franchise is concerned...come on. You don't have to be John Moores accountant to KNOW the value of the club has increased since leaving Qualcomm for Petco. Like you, I don't know every part of Sandy's job description either, but for him to feign ignorance on a simple question like that is just dishonest.
by Drama on Aug 21, 2007 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
also...
I would think something like this would hav been done via wire transfer.
by pjbno4 on Aug 21, 2007 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
in my experience
by Sammy G on Aug 21, 2007 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
SammyG
by Drama on Aug 21, 2007 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
silly drama
by Sammy G on Aug 21, 2007 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hahahahaha
by Drama on Aug 21, 2007 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only thing I would say
I'm in full agreement that the franchise appears to be more valuable, but that's because appearances are all about perception, and have little to do with the underlying reality.
by Phantom on Aug 21, 2007 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't have the numbers...
I'd be surprised if anyone said that Moores purchased the padres for anything other than a vehicle to drasticly increase the value of the lots he owned downtown.
by pjbno4 on Aug 21, 2007 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Condos/Hotels
Walking around the ballpark a bit shows how little people seemed to value the land around there as a lot of it is still warehouses and rundown buildings that could easily be profiting much more for the owners had they had more foresight. Much of it's being converted into different things, but it still surprises me a little bit to see some of the buildings, steps away from the ballpark, that don't seem to be getting used for anything.
by Dex on Aug 21, 2007 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with your disagreement
by planetjeffy on Aug 21, 2007 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















