The sick sad realization
In today's union trib the headline read "Pads losing ground, and Peavy in 2010."
I understand that 2010 means we still have two more years after this with Peavy in our rotation, but I have come to two thoughts since reading the article. The first being how sad it is that Peavy will become a free agent and bring in BANK, probably too much for the Padres to fork over. It's a sad feeling knowing that we probably can't keep our ace.
Secondly, why the hell would the Trib even run that story, 2010 is 2 and a half years away and no one wants to think that Peavy won't be a Padre after that. This is one huge problem i have with the Union their sports writers SUCK. With all the struggles the team has been through since the all-star break the last thing we/the team need to see is Jake talk about how he wants to leave when he is a free agent. Bill Center you are dead to me.
This FanPost was written by a member of the Gaslamp Ball community and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Gaslamp Ball managers or SB Nation.
0 recs |
21 comments
Comments
yeah i thought it was a little strange
by pads44 on Aug 19, 2007 11:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
First off,
Yeah, seriously; what's the point in writing crap like that? The optimist in me says maybe by then things will have changed and we'll have more than just Moores's TALK about wanting a superstar and wanting to die broke. We should find out who his primary care physician is and pay him off to tell Moores that he only has a year to live so he'll sink ungodly sums of money into long, long term contracts for all of our young stars and stars-to-be.
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 19, 2007 11:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The first thing
I cried when I read this. The Padres know that he is worth whatever money we can give him. Jake said he wants to stay here. The Pads have been good to him. He doesnt need or want the money. KT should know he is worth it.
Anyways, the UT is dumb. They are just trying to stir up more controversy and now is the time because of Zambranos contract.
Jake is not after money, he is after a championship ring.
by padresgirlforlife44 on Aug 19, 2007 1:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
my dad told me
by padparazzi on Aug 19, 2007 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But Jake didnt say he wanted to leave
Just a money issue, the Padres dont have it.
by padresgirlforlife44 on Aug 19, 2007 1:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
PEAVY
by Padres fanatic92014 on Aug 19, 2007 1:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
KT
by Winfield's Ghost on Aug 19, 2007 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i know i may be
if we all understand that the padres will not be able to afford peavy after 2009, why not trade him this off season? Chris Young has put up amazing numbers and could easily take over the ace position. Trading peavy would bring so much back in return after peavys cy caliber year that its worth thinking about.
I love peavy but the type of money he deserves will never be available in SD. Outside of money, peavy will never get the run support here that he deserves . In all honesty what is the use of having Peavy throw a scoreless six innings if our offense cant put up a single run?
We all fall in love with players, especially guys like Peavy who are a rarity in todays baseball. But NOBODY is bigger than the team. We need to do whats best for the padres and sell the stock high.
by soulSD on Aug 19, 2007 5:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
AHHH
No trading Jake.
by padresgirlforlife44 on Aug 19, 2007 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't really disagree
I've always had this weird feeling, though, that Jake may be the one guy Moores finally opens up the vault for IF Alderson gave the okay on a long term deal, which is a really big if.
by Winfield's Ghost on Aug 19, 2007 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree
by i miss bip on Aug 19, 2007 9:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too far away
by osbug on Aug 19, 2007 6:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
My take on the situation
Here's what I would do if I was the Padres.
After this season, you approach Jake and his agent and you tell him "Look, we want you to be a Padre for a long time, but if you want Zambrano money, it's not gonna happen. That said, lets see if we can work out a mutually beneficial deal by February 1st. If we can't work out something by then, we'll table discussions and see where the world takes us."
I think the Padres could reasonably offer 5 year/75 million at this point. You buy out 2008 and 2009 and add Peavy through 2012. Maybe even a club option for 2013.
I also think that the Padres need to make this as pbulic as possible, so they don't get burned. They can say that they tried to make a fair offer to Jake, and if he turns it down, he turns it down. If he really means what he says about wanting to stay a Padre, then they can work something out with him.
The reason I say the February deadline is because of something I heard on the post game show today. Kenterra brought up the great point that dealing Jake after this season would net you a huge return (you'd be trading him after one of his best years and he would be under control for 2 years). If you wait until the end of 2008 to trade him, you risk him having an unmemorable 2008 and 1 less year of control.
I love Jake and I want him to stay, but it's the San Diego Padres, not the San Diego Jake Peavys. Ultimately, this team has to do what's best for them in the long run. Although I would miss having Jake around next year, if we dealt him to the Yanks for something like Cano/Matsui/and other awesome prospects (hell, maybe even Hughes), I think you've got to listen. It's pessimistic to think about dealing him now, but if Jake makes it clear that he wants Zambrano money, then you might as well get something for him while you can.
by Phantom on Aug 19, 2007 6:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
by Winfield's Ghost on Aug 19, 2007 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly how i feel
by soulSD on Aug 19, 2007 8:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The current price
Of course, I hope that Jake would take something in the vicinity of 5 year/65 million. That's 13 mil a year and I would also suggest a 15 mil club option for 2013.
I think it's pretty weak that people are like "Moores and Sandy are teh suck! They hate Jake!" At the end of the day, baseball is a team sport. Jake knows what the financial climate of the Padres is, and if he really means it about wanting to stay in San Diego, he should be able to show it.
by Phantom on Aug 19, 2007 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now that I've finally
by TheThirdGonzalez on Aug 19, 2007 7:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
all i could think
But the first question I'd ask is, 'Can you give me your word that we're going to make an effort to win the World Series?'
i think this team doesn't feel like they are being given what they need to win. i felt like it was another way at jabbing at the front office for not making a serious run at things.
by socalgirl30 on Aug 19, 2007 9:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
What does it mean to win the World Series?
The more I talk about this article, the more I wish Jake had said something to the effect of, "We're trying to win a title. I can't worry about this right now." But he answered questions. He didn't blast the team, but he didn't hold back as much as I would have hoped.
No matter how much money this team spends, some people will never be satisfied that we're "going for it." This team has a ton of potential. If they can play to it, they'll do fine.
by Phantom on Aug 19, 2007 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree
by socalgirl30 on Aug 19, 2007 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Today's UT
Pitcher Jake Peavy and manager Bud Black met to discuss Peavy's comments in yesterday's Union-Tribune that he didn't expect to remain with the Padres beyond the end of his present contract in 2009.
"I was just being honest," Peavy reiterated yesterday. "I'd love to remain a Padre. I'd love to move my family full time to San Diego and spend my entire career with the only team I've ever played for.
"I just don't think that's going to happen. Believe me, I hope I'm wrong."
Several of his teammates also spoke with Peavy yesterday. The general theme: The timing of his comments could have been better.
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Aug 20, 2007 2:01 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by i miss bip on 
















