Padres prepare batter's eye for Hoffman's number retirement
The Padres are preparing to honor San Diego legend Trevor Hoffman by retiring his number prior to the game on August 21st. We've already bought our tickets to the game. You better get yours soon or it's just going to be just Hoffman and us celebrating, which would be cool for us and not cool at all for Hoffman.
This afternoon workers with construction helmets climbed atop the batter's eye in center field. They removed the numbers of the other Padres immortals: Steve Garvey, Tony Gwynn, Dave Winfield, Randy Jones and Jackie Robinson. One can safely assume this was done to make room for Trevor Hoffman's number 51.
The Padres have remained quiet as a field mouse about their plans for Hoffman's number. Nobody will tell us anything. They want the details to remain a surprise for Hoffman. It's not that we want to spoil the surprise, we are just dying to know... and to a lesser extent spoil the surprise. Somebody just tell us!
I'm examining this picture closely trying my best to figure out if they'll have enough room for all the numbers without all the digits running together into one longer number. I can't tell. Will they put the numbers in numerical order or group Padres together and leave Robinson's #42 off to the side? I have no idea.
I'm going to remain vigilant and keep a close watch on the batter's eye and try to catch the first glimpse of the 51 when it's lifted into place.
UPDATE: It's pretty clear now that all 6 numbers are going on top of the batter's eye. You can see them drilling the hole for Garvey's number now. I guess they needed to move his number farther out to create space, even though it was on the end.
UPDATE: Darn. I missed them actually put the numbers up. I wonder if they did it late in the evening or early this morning.
Why do you think they are all covered and not just Hoffman's? Did they purchase all new numbers? Will the numbers match the font and color of the uniform of the player's era?
The number on the far right appears wider than the one next to it. 42 seems like it would be wider than 51. Are they no longer in numerical order? Or is because they are using different fonts?
52 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
How about...
Just moving the 6 inside the Western Metal Building. just sayin
Steve Adler
www.Friarhood.com
www.FantasyDaddy.com
Co-Host of HBR on XTRA Sports 1360
www.xtrasports1360.com
by Steve Adler on Aug 11, 2011 2:05 PM PDT reply actions 3 recs
Does that mean they'd have to get rid of the Randy Jones BBQ?
Why ask a failed romance to come watch your successful one? You know, that's like inviting the Seattle Mariners to a World Series game. It's just weird for everyone.
better yet!
Scowling at Padres Losses since 1981
by Nater Tater on Aug 11, 2011 11:03 PM PDT up reply actions
are you only interested because
"You know, I was thinking of getting my bartender's license." Alan -The Hangover
by icaughthundleys#4 on Aug 11, 2011 2:12 PM PDT reply actions
your gaslamp ball shirts will now be irrelevant?
"You know, I was thinking of getting my bartender's license." Alan -The Hangover
by icaughthundleys#4 on Aug 11, 2011 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Irrelevant? I don't think so.
Everyone will have to buy a new one. Well not everyone, just the two people that have one.
Yeah we've never had much interest in the Padres or Hoffman
we’re mostly concerned with 5 year old t-shirts.
by jbox on Aug 11, 2011 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions 7 recs
I have a lot of favorite jbox responses...
…but this might be my all-time favorite.
"Way to be all matchy, f________." - TTG's Awesome Friend
by Winfield's Ghost on Aug 11, 2011 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions
It looks to me
Like they’ve taken all the numbers down. So if I’m a gambling man, then I say they are scrunching them all together.
"Beating the Red Sox feels SO GOOD.! SO GOOD! SO GOOD!" -jbox
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Maybe they'll make the numbers smaller
so they can include Trevor’s without having to scrunch them all together.
by SoCalBoltFan on Aug 11, 2011 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions
I would think their preference
Would be to recycle the old ones.
"Beating the Red Sox feels SO GOOD.! SO GOOD! SO GOOD!" -jbox
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Agreed
Except 42 is like mandated by MLB. I know its officially retired by MLB, i just dont know the rules on if teams are displaying retired numbers if they HAVE to display that one.
Scowling at Padres Losses since 1981
by Nater Tater on Aug 11, 2011 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
not really
he played 8 years for the padres, 9.5 for the yankees. His fued with Steinbrenner was pretty epic. He went into the HOF in a padres cap (the first padre to do so). He is vice president of hand shaking and healthy eating operations (or something like that) for the padres.
by kevintheoman on Aug 12, 2011 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Amazing and bravo.
Anyone who spikes a ball after tagging out a douche like Andres Torres is OK by me.
Can we hide 42 somehow?
Put it someone else in the stadium, away from where the real Padres are (’Garvey’s debate’ aside)?
I really hate how every team has to retire the number. Robinson never played for the Padres, and by the time the Padres were in the majors the game was integrated anyway. It’s not like Ruth’s number is retired in every stadium, though without him this game possibly would never have taken off the way it did within the popular imagination and tradition.
by TheFan09 on Aug 11, 2011 7:36 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
i'm kind of shocked
that there are actually people who are against jackie robinson’s number being retired across baseball. ruth may have helped popularize baseball, but jackie robinson’s contributions were much larger than the game itself. /soapbox
this is kind of like how some people were against us trading ryan ludwick away.
by iheartyourfart on Aug 11, 2011 8:35 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
im pissed about ludwick
that lowered our payroll dammit. we need to spend MORE money!!!! How are we ever going to win games and drive in runs without our leading RBI Guy Ludwick!!
Scowling at Padres Losses since 1981
by Nater Tater on Aug 11, 2011 9:08 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Robinson's contribution has implications
throughout our history and society. It should not only be retired, it belongs next to the others.
I'm totally with you.
I also think that California shouldn’t celebrate Independence Day, because we became a state after the Declaration of Independence was signed. And we shouldn’t commemorate Martin Luther King, Jr.‘s birthday, because he wasn’t from California.
by Darklighter on Aug 11, 2011 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
you sound like you're from arizona
diamondlol
by iheartyourfart on Aug 11, 2011 10:27 PM PDT up reply actions
It's totally nothing like that
First of all, without the Babe and a few other players there would not be a “moment” for Jackie Robinson to truly make. Let’s not make it sound like if the defunct XFL was all white and let on a black player, that the nation would care, and remember that decades into the future. Baseball was only famous because stars before that made it famous.
Secondly (for the other commenter) the Brown decision was the beginning of true integration in America (or you can say the National Guard being mobilized to enforce the decision was), not Robinson’s signing with the Dodgers. This was merely a cuter precursor to the inevitable main event. Eventually the league would become integrated anyway because segregation laws would be abolished due to the ineluctable court decision. And I suppose with that, whomever would be that new first Afro-American ballplayer would also get their place in history instead.
Personally I’m for all the ceremonies, the Hall of Fame exhibits, all of that. I believe that what Robinson did was important for African-Americans in ultimately the world at large. We can have a Jackie Robinson Day. I just think that the retiring of jerseys belongs to the individual club and the players who performed exceptionally for that club. Jackie Robinson did not play for the Padres, or the Pirates, or the Cubs, or the Yankees, or the Orioles. He played for the Dodgers, and he did an exceptional job doing so (as well as his “greater than the game” moments). Therefore, that certainly merits his number being retired by the Dodges organization. But the MLB just doing this by fiat for all clubs….I don’t think that it is a good thing, because it messes with what it means to have your number retired by a specific team. The sense of what makes your team your team gets ruined with this sort of action, not to mention this creates precedent for future commissioners to retire more jerseys across all of baseball. Basically, I just don’t feel like this is the true “baseball” way to deal with tradition (by ruining other traditions).
And finally, why is there no outrage for the first Latino player (who’s name doesn’t even come to mind immediately…which I think explains it all) in not receiving all this pomp?
by TheFan09 on Aug 11, 2011 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I can understand your point to some extent
I can understand retiring the number and mostly support it. I think an interesting quandry will come from the yankees when Rivera retires. He wears 42, and I would think his number be retired on its own merits, given that he likely will be the saves leader when he retires. Do the Yanks have 42 twice?
Regarding intergration, yes the Brown decision started the legal process, but Robinson in baseball helped with alot of the social mores and attitudes regarding the Acceptance and Embracing of other races.
Scowling at Padres Losses since 1981
by Nater Tater on Aug 11, 2011 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Do the Yanks have 42 twice?
Yep… they already have 8 retired twice.
"I'M NOT GOING TO ASK HIM FOR F_CKING TICKETS, DEX. I DON'T NEED A DEAL ON A F_CKING LUXURY SUITE." - Mike
the teams and the players voted
i think it was nearly unanimous that they wanted 42 retired.
by iheartyourfart on Aug 12, 2011 6:28 AM PDT up reply actions
i attribute it to mob mentality and peer pressure
nobody wants to look like a racist, even if the opposition to the move isn’t racist in motivation
by kevintheoman on Aug 12, 2011 7:25 AM PDT up reply actions
don't you love assumptions
that are only legitimate if you accept their shaky premise in the first place?
by iheartyourfart on Aug 12, 2011 8:26 AM PDT up reply actions
What team did he play for again?
And why do so many people here think Garvey’s number should be removed? So I guess only the white Dodgers aren’t welcome here. That is so racist./pretendsoapbox
by SeeAnFrockOh on Aug 11, 2011 10:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Ya, but in all seriousness
If the folks in charge of putting up the numbers accidentally dropped Garvey’s or just decided to donate it to the Kroc center, I’d be cool with it.
"Well, he ought to go home and find somebody else to bang." Jerry Coleman
by cubbuster on Aug 11, 2011 10:46 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Right now, it is just sitting on the ground in Petco,
waiting for someone to dispose of it properly.
I'm stoked
because I found out my softball game on the 21st is at 9:00 rather than 12:30.
Trevor Time is on.
The 51 has to be wider
cuz it’s going to shoot fireballs.
Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you? ◔ヮ◔
Uncommon Sportsman :: Absurdity in play
Or a ringing bell next to it
Why ask a failed romance to come watch your successful one? You know, that's like inviting the Seattle Mariners to a World Series game. It's just weird for everyone.

































