Did Aaron Harang really fix his mechanics?
This doesn't seem to bode too well.
about 1 year ago
jeph
5 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Whom do you trust?
So this article suggests that since their measure of release point hasn’t changed much for Aaron Harang, you should believe them in being skeptical that Harang is any better, not believe Balsley and Harang. Why? Why trust their measure of release point rather than a complete analysis of how the ball gets to that release point, which according to Balsley now gives more vertical motion to the ball than when Harang was having trouble in Cincinnati?
Shorter version: don’t believe everything you read.
by playingwithinmyself on Apr 11, 2011 11:10 AM PDT reply actions
Word
That dude spent like 2000 words and 3 graphs to say nothing.
I don’t think Harang is suddenly back to his Cy Young contending form, but I definitely trust Balsley and Harang’s thoughts on his mechanics more than that dude.
by Antonio Olivares on Apr 11, 2011 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions
Yep. I trust Balsley and Harang...
…but more than that, the results.
www.FriarsOnCardboard.blogspot.com
"jbox does not drink coffee, as it makes him clean house big time." ~Kev
by TheThinGwynn on Apr 11, 2011 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions
This is a situation where the saying, "There are lies, damned lies, and then there's statistics," holds true
Especially since Sophist McWantstoargue is using a ridiculously small sample size to prove a point.
Ehhhh, I don't deserve a signature...
I didn't even agree that the last chart resembled either of the previous two.
It looks like an entirely new delivery to me.



























