Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

The End of the San Diego Padres Shampoo Bottle Logo

I know the feeling when you pour mental effort and creative juices into something, only to have it laughed at when you thought it wasn't exactly funny and mocked as trivial when you thought it was important. I know that feeling at a certain level, and I wonder to myself how the original designer of this feels now:

Shampoobottle_medium

Yep... There she is in all her glory. Notice the "San Diego" in the 2010 version, a font which was previously exclusive to a Pantene bottle or a bottle of Garnier Fructis. The wave effect, ripped directly off of a bottle of Suave.  That combined with the alliterative nature of Padres, Pert, Protane and Pantene... Positively Perfect!

Except that I hated it. I mean, look at the images above. Even San Diego itself seemed to run away from the logo like, "Hey guys... I'm just gonna stand over here... and ummm... TAXI!!! TAXIIIIIIII!!!!"

So I wonder how the original designer felt about that effort. It was like, in trying so hard to avoid the 1970's, they completely focused on the fact that everybody had a lot of hair in that decade and then decided that the opposite of "hair" is "shampoo", when obviously that's insane.

Back on topic...

So they've abandoned the shampoo bottle logo and reworked it into this:

Padrestertiary_medium

So they took the homeplate outline, the most masculine thing in the previous logo, and they turned it into the outline of a Superman crest, thereby making it even more masculine. ROWR.

Now, instead of the bottom of the logo slowly filling with wave and white wash, a shout out to 1969 is thrown in there all bold and military logo like. Like a banner or a Swatch watch or something. I'm very glad the wave is gone. It was thrown in like a latent sexist symbol of washing luxurious hair in the 1980's. The thing seemed to rumble in a deep, soul singer's voice, "This one's... for the ladies". 

The drop shadow that once was used to give the "Padres" some pop has fled the scene, embarrassed for having tried to escape its flat fate, like a 3D pie-chart. 

And, perhaps most prominently, the skyline of Petco Park hovers over the word Padres. A proud reminder that we have a ballpark that is more than capable of hosting a baseball game and is the perfect venue for your next rock.

My thoughts:

Being firmly in the camp of hating the shampoo bottle logo essentially from the beginning, I'm glad that the Padres have moved away from it. From my understanding, this version of the logo is now tertiary, giving way to the interlocing SD and the Swingin' Friar so we may not see it in a lot of places.

This is a good thing, because, for as much as I appreciate the changes, there are little things that kinda stick out to me. I think the skyline was well done, but feels a little bit busy for my tastes. The wave is not completely abandoned as the one swath of underline still swooshes through like imitation Nike's in Korea. The script font in general is still there.

Still, as far as changes go, this one will be seen minimally and the previous one will now be seen not at all. Or, maybe, like 20 years from now when crazy kids totally grok with 1980's shampoo bottles and the director of marketing is then forced to reintroduce the shampoo bottle to satisfy the demands of their new younger, edgier market. Cest la vie.

Go Padres!

Comment 55 comments  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Gaslamp Ball

Favorite Padres Team Logo

Jun 2008 by jbox - 28 comments

Comments

Display:

Thats an interesting shot of Petco

I would have rotated it counter clockwise a bit and got the Western Metal Building. Rather than the Omni.

Padres Fan.

by MrDanielX on Nov 15, 2011 9:11 AM PST reply actions  

yeah I thought something similar

Though technically that’s the front of the park right there.

by Dex on Nov 15, 2011 9:19 AM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

It's not the Omni.

It’s one of the walking ramp structures:

by 'Eaters on Nov 15, 2011 11:37 AM PST up reply actions  

Oh yeah... THAT'S the front

I thought MrDanielX was saying that they should take the image from the back with Western Metal, but be sure not to include the Omni… or something… I dunno.

by Dex on Nov 15, 2011 1:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Ohhhh

Looked like it was the back of the LF with the Omni on it. My bad.

Padres Fan.

by MrDanielX on Nov 15, 2011 3:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Hey. They left "Petco Park" out of the logo.

Should we read anything into that? How long does Petco hold the naming rights?
Is this signaling a change in name? Who would be the replacement sponsor?
The Astros got stuck with Enron/Minute Maid. Could we do worse? “Ty-D-Bowl Park”?

by wegotballsley on Nov 16, 2011 6:22 AM PST up reply actions  

It's already pretty busy, so they probably didn't want anymore lettering.

And it’s selling the team, not the Petco brand. Now, if Petco had ponied up a few more $, maybe it would’ve made the logo.

by EvilSammy on Nov 16, 2011 8:52 AM PST up reply actions  

Petco paid $60M for 22 years worth of naming rights

So, we have until 2026 before we get to fret about some terrible new park name.

"second base is the bizness." -jbox

Bolts from the Blue - San Diego Chargers Blog Created By The Fans, For The Fans

by Wonko on Nov 16, 2011 11:08 AM PST up reply actions  

unless ..

Petco gets embroiled in some kind of trading scandal with insider sales of puppies and snakes, and then goes under, selling off their naming rights, and we become Kool-Aid park or something

Scowling at Padres Losses since 1981

by Nater Tater on Nov 17, 2011 2:30 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

the real shame is

that padres park would be such a cool name

by iheartyourfart on Nov 17, 2011 10:21 AM PST up reply actions  

I know

As far as corporate names go PETCO is pretty good. And better still they’re local. Believe me, I had to watch my childhood “ballpark” get renamed Network Associates Coliseum, McAfee Coliseum, Overstock.com Coliseum and now O.co Coliseum. A little bit of my childhood dies every time they do that.

by athletics68 on Nov 17, 2011 8:51 AM PST up reply actions  

It's MLB rules.

No sponsors on unis. When Citi Field opened, the Mets wore patches that said “Inaugural Season 2009” with no mention of the name.

www.FriarsOnCardboard.blogspot.com
"jbox does not drink coffee, as it makes him clean house big time." ~Kev

by TheThinGwynn on Nov 16, 2011 11:54 AM PST up reply actions  

The ballpark in this logo is a tad generic

but I agree that it’s better than the “shampoo bottle”, a reference I really hadn’t noticed until reading it here. In fact, I never really hated that logo, but was just rather indifferent to it, until you all talked me into hating it. Now I have to get that sticker off my car, but the new logos are not yet available in sticker form.

by EvilSammy on Nov 15, 2011 9:55 AM PST reply actions  

bring back the brown!

Amirite?!

Oh internet, what a wicked web you weave.

by Mad_Villain on Nov 15, 2011 10:59 AM PST via mobile reply actions   1 recs

I agree with your point in the previous post about the new-old friar looking too colorless. I sorta chalked it up to wanting to get rid of the sand, then I realized sand is alive and well in this tertiary logo. In my opinion, the team needs an accent color in their logos. Even teams that are famously blue and white like the Dodgers and the Yankees have a little red (Yanks in their hat logo).

So I did a little mock-up to see what sand would do to the friar and I think it’s a big improvement.

I also toyed with the primary just to see how it would look. Nothing really looked quite right, but I’d say this would be the best of them. The one-color is still probably the better choice.

by 'Eaters on Nov 15, 2011 11:30 AM PST reply actions   3 recs

Very nice

Agree with you, like the contrast in color.

Mat Latos is the real deal...Go Lakers, Pads, and Bolts

by mrbarneydangles on Nov 15, 2011 12:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah I like that

And I’m not particularly enamored with the sand. Just makes the Friar stand out more somehow.

by Dex on Nov 15, 2011 1:33 PM PST up reply actions  

I mean...

I’m not particularly enamored with the sand in general. In this case, I like the added color.

by Dex on Nov 15, 2011 1:34 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

this is awesome

i just dont get it. did moorad and garfie not ask to see this kind of variable? How could they hate. good job bro

If I pick it, I flick it

by Duke Street Kings on Nov 15, 2011 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Love it!

That was my biggest argument regarding the logos. They needed an accent color!! At the same time an additional color means an additional screen for t-shirts and stuff so using 1 color makes everything much cheaper. Perfect for this team I guess.

RJ's Fro - "Fro" Knows Baseball

by SDPads_1 on Nov 16, 2011 9:20 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Next time somebody talks to Tom

I’m gonna love it if it gets brought up like, “So Mentor… The single color logos… Cheaper right?” And then rub your fingers together while wagging your eyebrows.

by Dex on Nov 16, 2011 9:27 AM PST up reply actions  

I like the petco logo

I personally don’t get why they have decided to use sand in some places and not others, such as on this logo and as outline on the home jerseys. Apparently sand is still a Padres color, they’re just embarassed to use it.

[Comment From Jesse Jesse: ]
Do you imagine a scenario where we could, say, sell Hudson to a Japanese team?

by Natrone Means Business on Nov 15, 2011 2:20 PM PST reply actions  

I've been wondering this myself.

I thought it was retired, but it shows up here and there as a very tertiary color. I know everyone hated the sand road uniforms, but almost anything is better than road grays that are indistinguishable from Tampa or Milwaukee or countless other teams.

by EvilSammy on Nov 15, 2011 4:09 PM PST up reply actions  

not everyone hated the sand roads

I liked ‘em. Well, I liked the color of the fabric anyways. I just didn’t like the script.

by kevintheoman on Nov 15, 2011 4:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I think that was my problem as well

The bowtie “San Diego” script sucked. That was my issue. Also, I think the baggy style that players wear it with makes it look bad. If you wore them 80s style tight they’d look pretty slick.

"second base is the bizness." -jbox

Bolts from the Blue - San Diego Chargers Blog Created By The Fans, For The Fans

by Wonko on Nov 15, 2011 5:37 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

The thinking behind the new "Petco logo" was interesting

I was talking with a manager at the team store and apparently the reason it was included is they get a lot of demand for something with the park on it at both the team store and offsite. But until now they didn’t have any patches, clings, stickers, buttons, etc… that featured our awesome ballpark. This changes that.

by athletics68 on Nov 15, 2011 7:00 PM PST reply actions  

I love that Baltimore is going back to the cartoon bird

Wish they would have listened to the vocal minority and gone back to something with brown, yellow, or orange somewhere.

I like the newish Friar logo much better with that ring of sand (gold?), rather than all blue.

This is a terrible thing for the Padres. - Jerry Coleman

by Padres_Hobo on Nov 16, 2011 9:50 AM PST reply actions  

Not to pick on you

But I hate that “vocal minority” is catching on. I wish that the reference could be “Longtime Padres Fans” or something like that. Carries more weight than pushing the false premise that brown and gold is a minority.

by Dex on Nov 16, 2011 12:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I really don't think that's a false premise...

… but I’m with you on not liking “vocal minority”, which is a phrase you usually find attached to fringe political groups.

by Darklighter on Nov 16, 2011 12:21 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't feel that it's a false premise.

Seems apt to me. They are loud, but not in the majority.

"second base is the bizness." -jbox

Bolts from the Blue - San Diego Chargers Blog Created By The Fans, For The Fans

by Wonko on Nov 16, 2011 12:45 PM PST up reply actions  

What Wonko said

That’s said I think the ultimate answer now is to have it both ways. Throw the brown folks a bone and turn the alt uniform brown. Nothing says all the uniforms have to match (and god knows our military uniforms don’t match already). That way everyone is happy.

by athletics68 on Nov 16, 2011 1:46 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree

They plan to play in the alts every Saturday now. It would make a lot of sense (just like it makes sense for the Chargers to wear their alternate sorta throwback powder blues for 10% of their games) to just wear a throwback style brown and gold uni on Saturdays.

"second base is the bizness." -jbox

Bolts from the Blue - San Diego Chargers Blog Created By The Fans, For The Fans

by Wonko on Nov 16, 2011 1:59 PM PST up reply actions  

The Chargers wear powder blues for 3/5 of a game?

Do they take a timeout and change 6 minutes into the third quarter?

by Darklighter on Nov 16, 2011 2:26 PM PST up reply actions  

¿Que?

Why ask a failed romance to come watch your successful one? You know, that's like inviting the Seattle Mariners to a World Series game. It's just weird for everyone.

by Friar Fever on Nov 16, 2011 2:40 PM PST up reply actions  

I counted 16 games, because I didn't think about preseason.

10% of 16 games is 1.6 games. 0.6 of a game is 36 minutes. Thus, changing out of powder blues 6 minutes into the third quarter. I was being funny. Laugh, damn you!

by Darklighter on Nov 16, 2011 3:37 PM PST up reply actions  

They play 20 games

They wear them for 2 of them.

"second base is the bizness." -jbox

Bolts from the Blue - San Diego Chargers Blog Created By The Fans, For The Fans

by Wonko on Nov 16, 2011 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

It's a lame term

But it’s not a false premise. The majority seem to favor blue even if the brown lovers are out there and are vocal. Remember blue lovers have little to be vocal about, they have what they want. It’s like everything else, you don’t complain, unless you’re unhappy.

by athletics68 on Nov 16, 2011 1:47 PM PST up reply actions  

How do you know it's a majority?

I’ve never seen any polling done.

In any case, “admitting” to being in the vocal minority just seems defeatist.

by Dex on Nov 16, 2011 4:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Cognitively aware of the San Diego Padres since about 1980-1981... Fans since '76.
Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Kinghippo_small Dex

Untitled_small jbox

Faith Keeper

P1230002_small jodes0405