Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bracketology 2012: Duke Finally Steps Up To The No. 1 Line

Examining Clayton Richard

Like most of the Padres’ pitching staff, Clayton Richard is off to one heck of a start this season. His ERA is 2.73, his FIP is 3.07, and he’s amassed 1.3 Wins Above Replacement. That’s good—both his FIP and WAR lead our regular starting staff. The question is, how has he done it? Let’s take a look at his numbers, and see if we can figure it out.

Star-divide

When the Padres got Clayton from the White Sox in the Jake Peavy trade, he came with a reputation as a #4-5 pitcher. Here are his total 2009 numbers:

153 IP, 6.71 K/9, 4.18 BB/9, 1.00 HR/9, .301 BABIP, 72.0% LOB, 48.3% GB, 4.50 FIP


Those aren’t bad numbers. They’re solid, back-end starter material. Now, let’s look at this current 2010 numbers:

56 IP, 6.59 K/9, 3.54 BB/9, 0.16 HR/9, .312 BABIP, 79.1% LOB, 51.2% GB, 3.07 FIP

There’s some definite improvement there. The strikeouts are about the same and the walks are somewhat less, but the biggest single improvement in his performance has been his stinginess with the longball. Clayton has been taken deep only one time through 9 starts and 56 innings (in his start in Cincinnati), which is good for the third best HR/9 rate in the major leagues—only Ubaldo Jimenez and Barry Zito have been better in that regard. Richard has done this by improving his two-seam fastball, and by using it much more.

Iin 2009, Richard threw his 4-seamer 51.3% of the time, and the 2-seamer only 19% of the time. In 2010, he’s dropped his usage of the 4-seamer, throwing it only 23.8% of the time, and upped the use of the 2-seamer, now throwing it 35.6% of the time.

Richard has also increased the velocity of his 2-seamer. Where in 2009 he averaged 87.6 mph, this season he’s throwing it at an average of 91.2 mph.

The results of this have been clear—Clayton has significantly increased his groundball rate from 48.3% in 2009 to 51.2% in 2010, and he’s been able to significantly reduce his number of home runs surrendered. Fangraphs doesn’t distinguish between 2-seam and 4-seam fastballs when calculating the run values of pitches, but we can look at the overall value of his fastball and see an immediate difference. In 2009, his fastball was worth 6.2 runs above average overall and 0.38 runs per 100 pitches. In 2010, it’s been worth 10.1 runs over average and 1.95 runs per 100 pitches.

Whether or not he can keep this up over the whole year is an open question. He probably won’t keep up a 0.16 HR/9 rate. For comparison, in 2009 Chris Carpenter had a HR/9 of 0.33, and Tim Lincecum had a HR/9 of 0.40. But Richard appears to be an improved pitcher from 2009. Moving to the National League and pitching in Petco certainly helps. Richard probably won’t be a big strikeout pitcher—his career minor league K/9 is 5.80. But if he can keep his groundball rate high and home run rate low, he could be a good, above average pitcher.

This FanPost was written by a member of the Gaslamp Ball community and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Gaslamp Ball managers or SB Nation.

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Damn

I thought this was going to be about claymation porn.

Mountain West Connection ::Above the Rest::
Bolts From The Blue "There’s a gleam men. Let’s go get the gleam! Focus and Finish!!! One play at a time!!! Let's Go!!!"
it kind of reminds me of that movie "You've got mail"...I'm Tom Hanks he's Meg Ryan -- Padres prospect Matt Antonelli on sdsuaztec4

by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on May 24, 2010 9:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Damn

I thought it would be clayton with out a shirt on…….

"Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!"

by Ron Mexico on May 24, 2010 9:30 PM PDT reply actions  

Moist and wearing nothing but a towel....

…that’s how I like to examine him.

"It's disheartening to watch what has happened there."

by Drama on May 25, 2010 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

Damn

That was a pretty interesting.

I just want to get paid to draw naked girls, is that so much to ask?

by tonoxtono on May 24, 2010 9:48 PM PDT reply actions  

*Damn

 I meant, “That was a pretty interesting read.”

I just want to get paid to draw naked girls, is that so much to ask?

by tonoxtono on May 24, 2010 9:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

There was a dis?

This is a pretty complimentary post.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on May 25, 2010 12:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

No love for the decrease in BB rate?

To me that’s a nice touch to his line. The HR rate is probably Petco and little bit of sample size flukiness. Everyone always talked about how Petco would be a big help for him because of those US Cellular HRs. It’s good to see that he’s also improving somewhere he has more control of.

I also have to say that seeing dramatic changes in pitching style (like the 2 seam vs 4 seam thing) has to be a credit to Balsley. One of the things I said about some projections for the Padres before the season started is that they underrate the job Balsley can do with developing young pitchers. In recent years he’s had to deal with older guys and less talented youngsters. Now, with some “clay” to mold, he can actually sculpt some stuff like he did with Peavy, Linebrink and Bell.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on May 25, 2010 12:49 AM PDT reply actions  

You're absolutely right about the decreased walk rate.

I’ve been waiting for him to issue fewer free passes for some time. You like at his career minor league walk numbers, a 2.50 BB/9, and you can see he is capable of much better control than he’s shown here in San Diego. Even his first stint with the White Sox in 2008, he posted a BB/9 of 2.45. So this has been a long time coming to me, and I hope he keeps it up. He’s definitely capable of better.

I totally agree that you should credit Balsley. He clearly helping these guys pitch to their strengths and improve the stuff that they have. Even Adam Russell the other day was saying on the radio how the White Sox kept trying to make him do stuff he wasn’t comfortable with, but when he got here Balsley had him go right to what worked for him, and he’s seen much better results.

This is anecdotal, without any data to back it up, but as I mentioned on a game thread the other day Balsley told Scanman on 1090 that he’s working with Clayton to increase his strikeouts, and he expects to see him whiff more batters. If that indeed happens, Richard’s ceiling could increase even further.

Lastly in regards to the home run rate, you’re again totally correct that this is at least attributable in part to small sample size because it’s impossible to sustain a home run rate that low. But the increase in ground balls suggests he should be able to keep that rate lower than the 1.00 HR/9 he put up last year, and if you look at his minor league track record a big part of his success was always limiting home runs—career 0.40 HR/9 in the minors. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was able to put up an 0.50-0.60 rate on the season.

"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains."
Bolts From The Blue - Heavy with the facts, slightly less heavy with the opinions.

by Zach (maestro876) on May 25, 2010 8:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't be surprised by a .5-.6 HR this season either

But me and a number of other people that commented on Clayton’s move to SD would be surprised if he had done that while pitching half his games at US Cellular.

No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on May 25, 2010 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

I did some

analysis of Richard’s repertoire at Friar Forecast just recently. Check it out if you’re interested. What I think happened is that the gameday algorithm to classify pitches has changed, resulting in what appears to be a different pitch selection for Richard (ie, more two-seamers this year), but really isn’t.

by Myron Logan on May 29, 2010 11:44 AM PDT reply actions  

And there goes my whole argument.

Yay!

"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains."
Bolts From The Blue - Heavy with the facts, slightly less heavy with the opinions.

by Zach (maestro876) on May 29, 2010 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Cognitively aware of the San Diego Padres since about 1980-1981... Fans since '76.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Ss1095_small
Gaslamp Fantasy Ball is Live!
Img_0065__1__small
GLB Meetup at Fan Fest2012
Lexiandnathantennis_small
Ballpark Experience
The_show_i_believe_small
Padres Little League Initiative Makes Me Wish I Was a Little Leaguer
Logos_small
New ballpark for USD
Untitled_small
What if: the Padres Weren't Called the Padres?
Beatla_small
Dream Diary - The Top Hat
Small
Alex "sell-out" Smith
Diveflag_small
Gonzo on the cover of MLB 2012 The Show
Dont-panic-thumb_small
Josh Byrnes Tweetup Recap

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Kinghippo_small Dex

Untitled_small jbox