Padres can't match Adrian Gonzalez's salary expectations; Mets GM Alderson will make DePodesta appealing offer
XX Sports Radio: Jed Hoyer Interview (MP3) with Darren Smith
- Hoyer is starting to have meaningful discussions, "things will start happening very soon".
- MLB changed all the significant off season dates, which forces teams to make decisions quicker. Hoyer thinks it is great thing for everybody since there will be more early signings and less guys hanging during Spring Training.
- Hoyer was not surprised by Jon Garland or Yorvit Torrealba becoming free agents. Hoyer talked to both of their agents. "It was pretty clear they had good seasons and wanted to test the market. They feel like that was their best option. It didn't surprise me. It's their right." They were willing to walk away from the one year option they had with the Padres.
- The Padres will certainly continue to talk to Chris Young about coming back.
- As for picking up Adrian Gonzalez's option. "Adrian's decision was probably the easiest in baseball."
- The Padres had a one year mutual option with Jon Garland for $6.75 million. He was looking for a multiple year deal in free agency. Hoyer does have interest in possibly signing him if he doesn't get a better offer from another team. They'll continue to talk.
"I guess to sum it up, nothing has really changed since we sat down last year and nor did I expect it to. I think that Adrian went out and had another terrific season. I think at this point with a year away from free agency I think Adrian's desire is to go out after a franchise player type contract. That's his right and I certainly don't begrudge him at all. He is pretty close to free agency and that's something he wants to explore. At this point it's a near certainty that he at least explores free agency. I think that's what I expected before going to lunch and that was confirmed."
The San Diego Discount was not discussed. His agent was talking about a Mark Teixeira type contract and the Padres are not one of the teams that can afford that. "Based on our conversation yesterday, what we could do and where they were looking weren't really matching up."
98 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
See ya Adrian
Nice having you here in San Diego
Understanding is a three edged sword; your side, their side and the truth.
Bolttalk Podcast - the Best Chargers show on the Web!
Unfortunately it sure appears that way
UNLESS WE WIN THE WORLD SERIES NEXT YEAR!!!!!!!!!!!!
Which probably won’t happen. If Hoyer for sure feels that we won’t pay him I hope we don’t hold on to him through 2011 and hope he signs with us as a free agent for a discount. We should deal him before the deadline and load up on prospects.
With the right prospects in this deal and are already young talent, we could be looking good in a few years.
Anyone know how long we have Latos locked up? When’s he arbitration eligible?
Mat Latos is the real deal...Go Lakers, Pads, and Bolts
by mrbarneydangles on Nov 4, 2010 8:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Latos won't be arb. eligible until 2013
Won’t hit free agency until 2016.
"I don't think about the things I say. You guys are the ones who think about it."
by surferfromSD619 on Nov 5, 2010 1:03 AM PDT up reply actions
I think you have to approach this season as if we are contenders
That means you can’t trade Adrian strictly for prospects. That could sacrifice this season without getting any known value in return (as great as prospects are you can’t count on them for anything). Flags fly forever. You have to try to capitalize on winning whenever you have a chance. That means that as long as you are in the hunt trading Adrian strictly for prospects is not an option.
However, you can trade him if you get major leaguers in return. That’s always a bit easier to do in the offseason, however as jbox points out, the shoulder injury could affect that.
When the Padres were losing more games than they won, then they were in need of rebuilding. That’s where all the Adrian and Peavy rumors came from. They aren’t that team anymore. Things have changed. And you can just give away Adrian for something that doesn’t help the team right now.
Think about it this way. Teams in the hunt trade for players with one year left on their contract all the time. We did it just this season with Miguel Tejada. We did it in 1998 with Kevin Brown. Why would you be in favor of adding those players to contenders, but be willing to trade Adrian Gonzalez away with one year on his deal.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
by Wonko on Nov 5, 2010 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Word.
www.FriarsOnCardboard.blogspot.com
"jbox does not drink coffee, as it makes him clean house big time." ~Kev
by TheThinGwynn on Nov 5, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions
I think my last paragraph was the kicker
I probably could have left the rest out.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Nah...
Any time you get the chance to say “Flags fly forever”, you have to go for it.
www.FriarsOnCardboard.blogspot.com
"jbox does not drink coffee, as it makes him clean house big time." ~Kev
Agreed.
Bolts from the Blue // "It is what it is." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // "Richard is a jewel." - Kid Nate
I just don't think there's any choice.
In some respects were in an untenable position. Deal your one established star for prospects that have an overwhelming chance of flaming out or eat the seed corn for a one-shot reload next season. The only thing for sure is that he won’t be here in 2012.
But whether or not Adrian stay’s or gets dealt won’t be just a baseball decision. It’s far and away a budgetary one. Given the reality that this will be a 40-50 million dollar ballclub for the next 4-5 years we have to make all the baseball decisions with that in mind. The only way in hell were going to be competitive over that time is if we successfully deal established stars for cheap, high value prospects. If we manage to snag someone’s Carlos Gonzalez then we’ll be golden. If we get someone’s Justin Smoak, were screwed. This season was great, but the odds of us replicating it are less than the odds of serious regression. No stars to deal, no money to sign free agents, depressamundo.
Naw, let’s get the best prospects we can for Adrian and Bell then fill out the roster with the Ty Wiggintons, Russ Branyans, or Adam Laroches of the world. Even if the prospects flop we should still at least be competitive and if we aren’t at least we can claim players on waivers to rebuild for the long, tough road ahead.
"Never have a motto, that's what I always say" - Me
What do you have against Justin Smoak?
My name is Guybrush Threepwood, and I'm a mighty pirate.
"How appropriate! You fight like a cow!"
Faceless slider-tossing goofs FTW.
by Zach (maestro876) on Nov 6, 2010 8:38 PM PDT up reply actions
Nothing, I still think he's a blue chip prospect.
But if we deal Adrian and replace him with Smoaks .218/.307/.371 line from last year we’re toast. That was my original point. I think he’ll bounce back but in developing him we might miss out on being competitive.
"Never have a motto, that's what I always say" - Me
JESUS! HARM ANAL MENACE - Name anagram, lol.
Go take a peek at Adrian's line when we traded for him.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Not baggin on Smoak!
Cheezus!
"Never have a motto, that's what I always say" - Me
JESUS! HARM ANAL MENACE - Name anagram, lol.
Hopefully the Padres losen the purse strings
It would sting to have Adrian walk away and to replace him with Kyle Blanks.
You have $120 million lying around?
It’s not a question of “loosening the purse strings”, it’s a question of having the financial resources to do it. The Padres don’t. Simple as that.
My name is Guybrush Threepwood, and I'm a mighty pirate.
"How appropriate! You fight like a cow!"
Faceless slider-tossing goofs FTW.
by Zach (maestro876) on Nov 5, 2010 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Disagree!
They have the resources but instead choose not to spend it. That is their business model.
I’m not arguing whether they should or shouldn’t spend the money on AG. Simply pointing out that they DO have the money, but instead choose not to spend it. MLB teams are a lot wealthier than they let on. That became well documented this year with the release of several teams financial records.
Yes, and that documentation was well analyzed
And proved to be mostly misleading about how much extra finances the team’s have. Team’s are run for a profit, they have to be. But, the Padres or Pirates or whatever still don’t have the resources to spend a lot of extra dollars without going into the red.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
by Wonko on Nov 8, 2010 12:37 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
And so they cycle continues...
Trade away now-too-expensive talent for great prospects. Suck for a few years and then suddenly surge when the young talent matures, only to fall a little short of the playoffs or World Series. But of course, as soon as the talent matures, they become too expensive and are traded away for more future prospects…
Who were all of those mega-talented players that the Padres
dumped as soon as the started to mature.
Adrian has been productive for five full years, which makes him a bad example. Jake was around for seven years and was has been on the DL extensively since he was traded, another bad example.
I like that. In theory thats what happens but like field39 said, who are they from us
If I pick it, I flick it
by Duke Street Kings on Nov 5, 2010 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions
Sheffield works
Carter hit .232/.290/.391 in his one year as a Padre. He was traded for Mcgriff, who was already an established star when he came to San Diego.
good point
plus i think Carter is remembered as better than he really was
"I suggest more bike" ~KSK
www.throughbucknerslegs.com
IMAO
Their problem is not the stars that get away. Their problem is that they rarely draft players that turn into stars.
this
Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser. -- Vince Lombardi
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Nov 5, 2010 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions
I kind of doubt that Adrian will be traded until his shoulder injury is fully healed
I can’t see a team trading their farm for him until he proves he can play without pain.
Adrian Deserves Texiera type contract
and there is NO WAY the Padres SHOULD pay that. In fact I would be dissapointed if they did sign him to that contract. For all those trolls/mouth breathers, that think the padres should loosen their purse string…go to Cot’s contracts and look at all those big contracts in the last 12 years.
Now how many of them were good in retrospect? How many of them did the star actually perform to the levels expected, but was still a bad idea for the team because of the finanacial impacts? (think Arod with the Rangers).
Now consider this, we moved out of the steriod era, players really do start to decline in their mid 30’s. So while we may be giving up 2 years of Adrian’s prime, we will probably have 2 years of him just past his peak, and 3-4 years of him just being above average, but making 25-35% of the payroll.
The truth is t hat only 4-5 teams should be giving out those contracts and the Padres are not one of them. I also believe that the Twins will regret the Joe Mauer contract in a few years.
"Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!"
by Ron Mexico on Nov 5, 2010 11:49 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
The Twins could do the Mauer contract
because they have far larger resources than the Padres. If the Padres had what the Twins have, they could re-sign Adrian.
My name is Guybrush Threepwood, and I'm a mighty pirate.
"How appropriate! You fight like a cow!"
Faceless slider-tossing goofs FTW.
by Zach (maestro876) on Nov 5, 2010 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions
How do the Twins have greater financial resources than the Padres
That’s what I can’t understand. Both have new stadiums and the Padres are in a bigger market.
The Twins are in the 15th biggest television market.
The Padres are in the 28th biggest television market.
Yup
And based off of that the Twins just negotiated a huge TV contract.
The problem with San Diego is it is isolated. To the west is ocean, to the east is desert, to the north is Angels and Dodgers territory and to the south is Mexico where they are not allowed to negotiate for broadcast rights. So, you’re left with the city and suburbs, which is something like 3 million people. The area around Minneapolis-St. Paul is 2.8 million, the surrounding suburbs of St. Cloud and Bloomington add in another 1 million and the state of Minnesota (including those areas) is 5 million.
Their owner is also one of the wealthiest men in America (and probably the world).
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
by Wonko on Nov 5, 2010 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
My only thing here
is that we’re soon to negotiate our own TV contract very shortly (supposedly for more money). Shouldn’t we basically take those excess new funds and keep Adrian on the field?
A new deal won't change their market ranking.
They may go from $5M per year to $10M, but they won’t get near the $50M that the Angels get every year.
I don't think you can bank on that anyway
Until you have that money in hand. Maybe if you were run by some aggressive one man show ownership that was willing to take big risks, but not when you have board members to answer to.
And what field39 said.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
I don't think the Twins are going to like the Mauer deal in 4 years
"Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!"
I'll take him off their hands!
Err…I mean…Uhh..yeah, they’re not going to like it in 4 years…
"You're like the nicest internet person I know." - theodore donald kerabatsos
The Twins payroll is $97 million
And Mauer makes $23M. Zito and Rowand combined for $30M of the Giants $97M and they turned out okay. The key, of course, will be to keep churning out prospects to replace the guys around Mauer as he gets older. The Twins seem to still be capable of that.
However, you might be referring to his ability to stay a catcher. That would be a worry if I were them.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
that is what I was referring to
I think overall they will be okay with the salary, but I don’t think internally they are going to be thrilled with Joe’s production compared to the % of payroll he takes up. The yankees and Red Sox can afford to have an AJ Burnett, Hall type of contracts.
The Giants were able to negate Zito’s contract with the rest of the pitching staff stepping up and a rookie hitting the staff at the right time. Rowand was hidden with Huff, Burrel, Ross, Torres type of production, but how often will all those moves work out?
"Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!"
Find another Adrian Gonzalez
Most fans won’t even notice. They’ll just think he’s having an off year.
Don't hate the game, hate the nerds!
Edgar!
Oh internet, what a wicked web you weave.
by Mad_Villain on Nov 5, 2010 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Got any idea how we can kidnap Carlos?
Understanding is a three edged sword; your side, their side and the truth.
Bolttalk Podcast - the Best Chargers show on the Web!
by TheAxManCometh on Nov 5, 2010 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, offer him a chance to play with arid balls
…er, what I mean is, there’s no humidor at Petco
The Padres are good, but make no mistake: we've gotta beef up the linwup.
If I had a nickel from every SBN blog that has banned me, Arrowhead Pride would owe me 5¢.
by StrangeBroP25 on Nov 13, 2010 11:17 AM PST up reply actions
The biggest issue with trading him, in my opinion
is that I’m not sure what team out there has the pieces that we’d want in a trade.
My name is Guybrush Threepwood, and I'm a mighty pirate.
"How appropriate! You fight like a cow!"
Faceless slider-tossing goofs FTW.
by Zach (maestro876) on Nov 5, 2010 1:09 PM PDT reply actions
The Giants
For Bumgarner, Torres and DeRosa. Maybe a prospect too. Maybe more prospects and no DeRosa if he can’t pass a physical.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Funny
If you pretend Kemp doesn’t have an attitude, would you trade him straight up for AGon. What if we also pretend that the trade is not the hated Dodgers?
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Well the Giants are hated, too
I don’t think there is a way in hell they part with Bumgarner. With him they have to have the best rotation in baseball, right?
Oh internet, what a wicked web you weave.
Yeah, they probably wouldn't
But its the only piece I could think of that would help us stay competitive in 2011.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
I get the feeling
that Adrian doesn’t just want money, but after all these years at PETCO, he wants to go to a band box and mash for 500 career hr’s.
Oh internet, what a wicked web you weave.
He doesn't get that choice until he goes to free agency though.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
But teams that trade top prospects for him
need to consider that before deciding to trade for him with the intention of extending him.
Oh internet, what a wicked web you weave.
I don't think they'd ever trade him to a division rival.
And as has been pointed out, they’d never trade Bumgarner, and I don’t think I’d want DeRosa. First of all, I’m not sure he’s got a wrist left. Second, he’d be 36 and I’m not sure how he’d make us better in the short or long term.
My name is Guybrush Threepwood, and I'm a mighty pirate.
"How appropriate! You fight like a cow!"
Faceless slider-tossing goofs FTW.
by Zach (maestro876) on Nov 5, 2010 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Plus Torres is also past 30 and won't be this good for much longer.
My name is Guybrush Threepwood, and I'm a mighty pirate.
"How appropriate! You fight like a cow!"
Faceless slider-tossing goofs FTW.
by Zach (maestro876) on Nov 5, 2010 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions
We need a CF and a 2B
Assuming DeRosa is healthy and there’s some evidence that 2010 wasn’t a complete fluke, then Torres is useful as a CF.
I don’t see what age has to do with it if they can both produce.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Well the fact that they're older
makes it less likely that they’ll produce, and that even if they do they wouldn’t for a real long time.
My name is Guybrush Threepwood, and I'm a mighty pirate.
"How appropriate! You fight like a cow!"
Faceless slider-tossing goofs FTW.
by Zach (maestro876) on Nov 5, 2010 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions
I think you have to evaluate it outside of age
And simply look for a deal that at least keeps you the same in 2011 and better off than being Adrian-free in 2012. Thinking longer term than that and sacrificing the present is foolhardy.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
I feel like the Red Sox would have pieces that make sense.
Getting Clay Buccholz and Daniel Bard back would make us better in the short and long term, though you probably wouldn’t want to make that deal unless you’re willing to sign Buccholz long term, as he’s already got significant service time.
My name is Guybrush Threepwood, and I'm a mighty pirate.
"How appropriate! You fight like a cow!"
Faceless slider-tossing goofs FTW.
by Zach (maestro876) on Nov 5, 2010 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions
But you'd need at least one, possible two position players as well
and I don’t know who they’d be. I don’t think Ellsbury makes much sense anymore.
My name is Guybrush Threepwood, and I'm a mighty pirate.
"How appropriate! You fight like a cow!"
Faceless slider-tossing goofs FTW.
by Zach (maestro876) on Nov 5, 2010 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions
But he's perfect!
He’s cute!
/reason why I’ll never be a GM
"You're like the nicest internet person I know." - theodore donald kerabatsos
Clay Buccholz is a much more established pitcher than Bumgarner
There is zero incentive for the Red Sox to trade him. I don’t know why anyone would even consider him attainable. Especially given how Lackey, Matsuzaka and Beckett are exactly working out in Boston.
This sounds like you recycled a comment from 2 years ago.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
I'm guessing that in order to get Buccholz
We would have to sweeten the deal with more than just Adrian. That’s how valuable he is.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
I agree
which is why I don’t think it’s realistic. I probably should have said that.
My name is Guybrush Threepwood, and I'm a mighty pirate.
"How appropriate! You fight like a cow!"
Faceless slider-tossing goofs FTW.
by Zach (maestro876) on Nov 5, 2010 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Try instead
Lowrie, Ellsbury, Bard, Kelly, Iglesias
Understanding is a three edged sword; your side, their side and the truth.
Bolttalk Podcast - the Best Chargers show on the Web!
by TheAxManCometh on Nov 5, 2010 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Its a nice haul
But it still strikes me as sacrificing 2011.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
I think Bards off the table.
But I’d take Micheal Bowden off their hands instead. If we could get Lowrie, Ellsbury, Bowden, Kelly, I’d be dancing in the streets.
"Never have a motto, that's what I always say" - Me
did
you just suggest that we trade for Mark Derosa?.!
by schwing and a miss on Nov 5, 2010 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions
I suggest that we find a 2B. A healthy DeRosa would play 2B.
A non-healthy DeRosa would not be something to trade for.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
New idea: Back to the Rangers
For Julio Borbon, Derek Holland, Michael Kirkman and Martin Perez.
That’s probably too much for them to give up though.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
This is the kind of deal the Padres will make
hopefully.
Hoyer is in a strong position here.
No hurry to dump Adrian and lots of teams want him
Has Norv been fired yet?
There is some hurry if you're relying on lots of teams wanting him
The closer you get to the season, the more teams will make commitments regarding their 1B/DH situations.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
I do not believe Jed will treat the situation,
as if he needs to be in a hurry. Nor will there be any “The train has left the station,” moments.
I agree
I was just pointing out how the statement “No hurry to dump Adrian and lots of teams want him” contradicted itself.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
I'd consider swapping one of those players for Michael Main and see if he can switch back to hitting.
Ehhhh, I don't deserve a signature...
That sounds like too much gambling
I was trying to remove a lot of the risk out of these deals.
You don’t want to be like the Phillies who basically ended up trading Cliff Lee for nothing since all the prospects they got in return flopped in less than a year.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Lets give it up for Ruben Amaro Jr.
Oh! Sweet Nuthin'
by CurbEnthusiasm on Nov 5, 2010 9:41 PM PDT up reply actions
One for Michael Main?
Some of those guys you named fall under the TINSTAAPP tag…
Ehhhh, I don't deserve a signature...
I named three pitchers
Two are ready for the majors right now and one (Perez) is just a roll of the dice because I wanted at least one upside play and he’s a buy low play right now. Michael Main still hasn’t pitched in AAA. You also have to keep in mind that the team trading for him only gets one guaranteed year or less. You’re not going to get back a top prospects (grade A, 5 star, whatever) unless he’s not major league ready or its all you get.
That’s why I think when you look at a return you probably want one or two guys that the other team doesn’t have much plans for, but could be useful to the Padres as 2B, SS, CF. C or P. That’s what Borbon and Kirkman are. One can play good CF defense and has hit in the minors and even in short stints in the majors and the other worked over AAA and could succeed at Petco even though scouts aren’t in love with him. Holland is the real haul since he was a former top prospect and has had success in the majors. Perez is probably asking too much for the Rangers to give up on him when his value is low, but it’d be nice to get someone who is a couple years away and has upside.
That’s not to say my deal is perfect or anything. Just that its what you’d expect. Its similar to the Peavy deal where we got two major league ready guys, one was somewhat established (Richard) and one didn’t fit into their plans (Russell). You got the prize top prospect that wasn’t a sure thing (Poreda) and a long term upside play (Carter).
I argue this plan of attack is better than getting “the best prospects” where you get a bunch of guys in A ball and AA who rank highly on prospect lists, but can’t help you now and present the real possibility that they’ll never help you.
Also, with the TINSTAAP thing, since I was using the Rangers the prospects there are mostly pitchers. Cost of doing business with that club.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Wow, the TINSTAAP thing really got under your skin...
It wasn’t meant to be that.
I mentioned Main for personal reasons. I couldn’t believe the Padres picked Nick Schmidt over him, and if we’re naming dream deals it would be nice to see him added into the Padre system. I know he was scouted as being capable as a hitter or pitcher, and the Rangers converted him to pitching. I’d like to see what he could do as a hitter, and his struggles as a pitcher might make him a buy low/high ceiling type project.
Plus, the Padres need hitters. Badly.
Ehhhh, I don't deserve a signature...
we might have to beat out the Brew Crew if they are serious about moving Baby Cheeks
If I pick it, I flick it
by Duke Street Kings on Nov 5, 2010 2:48 PM PDT reply actions
The Dodgers should have traded for that guy years ago.
It still baffles me that they didn’t.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Speculate, but verify.
Nobdy will trade for Adrian in the off-season after the shoulder surgery. The Padres will be contenders at the deadline and will have to keep him. He’ll get his World Series ring, become a FA and sign with Boston, which will never get to the World Series while he plays for them. The Padres will get two draft picks and grab two impact players. Blanks will take over in 2012, and after the elbow fix will hit all-fields homers both home and away, the Pads will successfully defend their world championship, and everyone will be saying “Adrian who?” My Ouija board says so.
What we apparently should do
http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/hotstove10/insider/news/story?id=5756428
We should go after Carl Crawford
Understanding is a three edged sword; your side, their side and the truth.
Bolttalk Podcast - the Best Chargers show on the Web!
I CAN'T SEE!!!!
Your special specialness (or money) allows only you and other “Insiders” to see that article. But, luckily you paraphrased it.
Crawford would be a nice pickup for the Padres. His ability to run would pay dividends, but for probably 12 million dollars or so, they’d be paying him more than he’d pay back.
"Well, it's just ineffable." "Oh, so I'm not 'F-able'?" "No, no, ineffable means it can't be explained." "So I'm stupid?"
If we could add Crawford and keep Adrian
We would be really talking with our young pitching as well. Too bad keeping Adrian is too expensive, let alone adding Crawford.
It’s the off season, it’s ok to dream, I know I am.
Mat Latos is the real deal...Go Lakers, Pads, and Bolts
by mrbarneydangles on Nov 7, 2010 7:56 PM PST up reply actions
I want whatever your smoking
For you cheap bastards here’s the Padres part
The San Diego Padres should sign Carl Crawford
Even with Petco Park squelching offense, the Padres managed to rank just 11th in the league in team True Average, suggesting they need to do Adrian Gonzalez the favor of bringing in better help than just renting Miguel Tejada or adding a year and two months of Ryan Ludwick before he reaches free agency. Perhaps just as importantly, they need to show Gonzalez that any effort to re-sign him will be sincere. And finally, with a payroll that was in the vicinity of $40 million in 2010, they figure to be on the union’s watch list for clubs possibly pocketing revenue-sharing cash.
So the easy fix is to pay top dollar for a player whose blend of skills and profile would give them an excellent answer to many of these problems. Because of his stolen-base tallies, it might seem obvious that Crawford would give the Pads a real leadoff man, someone who would give Gonzalez that many more RBI opportunities (when he isn’t being intentionally walked at a Pujolsian pace). He’d end up offering more than that, though: speed and tremendous defense, yes, but also the ability to make quality contact (.331 career BABIP), and enough power to play well in their home park, which becomes that much tougher in divisional matchups in the bandboxes in Arizona and Colorado. Add in the benefit of coming over from the toughest division in the tougher league, and the Petco effect shouldn’t deter the Padres from getting into the thick of what figures to be one of the biggest bidding wars of the winter. Since he’s only just heading into his age-29 season and speed players tend to age better, Crawford is the sort of big-ticket offensive help Padres GM Jed Hoyer should make a point of affording.
Understanding is a three edged sword; your side, their side and the truth.
Bolttalk Podcast - the Best Chargers show on the Web!
by TheAxManCometh on Nov 7, 2010 8:31 PM PST up reply actions
They aren't going to pay Adrian.
What on God’s green earth makes you think they’ll pay for Carl Crawford?
This writer is insane.
My name is Guybrush Threepwood, and I'm a mighty pirate.
"How appropriate! You fight like a cow!"
Faceless slider-tossing goofs FTW.
by Zach (maestro876) on Nov 7, 2010 10:39 PM PST up reply actions
I was thinking Bill Hall might be a nice pickup.
He’s versatile, maybe not at the positions we need but it’s a long season. Jairstons ability to man multiple postions was a real luxury last year. One I’d like to keep going if possible.
But if you can get Carl Crawford and Cliff Lee…I’ll take that instead.
"Never have a motto, that's what I always say" - Me
JESUS! HARM ANAL MENACE - Name anagram, lol.
Bill Hall
Hall’s reputation for versatility seems to have outlived his actual versatility. I’m sure he’s willing to play multiple positions, but he hasn’t shown himself to be a particularly effective SS, 2B or OF. He seems to be able to play 3B.
I’d also think that his hitting profile doesn’t suit Petco. More reliance on contact and patience and less on free swinging home run dependence would be the ideal.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Glad I pocketed my revenue on this one
First, he says that the front office might be keeping money off the table. A bold claim, to say the least. So, his idea on how to stay off the watch list is to splurge on a guy who can give RBI chances to a guy who may only be on the team for mere months? Hmm… And what happens when Adrian leaves? We have a guy who’s just turning 29. We have a few guys around that age. I don’t think the Padres can just throw HUGE money at a guy nearing the big Three Oh.
Now, if they sign him, I’ll turn into a total chick and fawn over our new god. But that’s the future. Will it happen? Probably not. If it does happen, I might cry manly, awesome tears.
"Well, it's just ineffable." "Oh, so I'm not 'F-able'?" "No, no, ineffable means it can't be explained." "So I'm stupid?"
If you look at comparable 1B
The bug Three-Oh isn’t that big of a deal. Historically, hitters of Adrian’s ability should keep performing at a similar level from ages 28-34.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
agreed
but I think we will start to see bigger declines in the 35-38 years, than we did in the PED era. So while I think Adrian could be earning close to his $25M a year in the first 3 years of that contract, the back 2-3 years could be really bad, especially if its backloaded.
"Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!"
It was in reference to Crawford
I was refering to Crawford approaching his 30s. I don’t think the Padres should throw 12-15 million at him with the idea that usually speed guys get better with age. One bad turn around 2nd base and he could be an 85 million dollar regret.
And with 1B, I know that age is just a number (i.e. Paul Konerko). Adrian will stay effective for at least the length of his next contract.
"Well, it's just ineffable." "Oh, so I'm not 'F-able'?" "No, no, ineffable means it can't be explained." "So I'm stupid?"
No one thinks the Padres should throw money at Crawford
other than one lunatic espn.com writer.
My name is Guybrush Threepwood, and I'm a mighty pirate.
"How appropriate! You fight like a cow!"
Faceless slider-tossing goofs FTW.
by Zach (maestro876) on Nov 9, 2010 9:34 AM PST up reply actions
And Christina Kahrl.
No, I don't think you're an idiot. Please don't go trying to prove me wrong about that.
Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't
Eighty-second!
www.FriarsOnCardboard.blogspot.com
"jbox does not drink coffee, as it makes him clean house big time." ~Kev


























