Scott Hairston traded to A's, Padres giving up on season
Scott Hairston is now an Oakland A and the Padres are proud owners of more minor league pitchers.
I seem to remember the Padres not being very good when Hairston was out on the DL for 16 games with that bicep injury. If I counted correctly, the Padres had a 5-11 record without him. Now there's even less of a reason to pitch to Adrian Gonzalez.
The fact that Hairston got choked up when he learned of his trade makes him a really endearing player and a little bit of a cry baby, but mostly an endearing player. He wanted to be in San Diego, that's more than you can say about a lot of other players. Guarantee we won't hear about Peavy getting choked up when he is eventually traded.
I understand the Padres have absolutely no chance of doing anything this year, hell everybody knows that except Heath Bell. The problem is that with Hairston gone, the chances of the Padres even threatening to score has just been reduced drastically.
The white flag of surrender is being flown above Petco Park. I see it now, the invitation for other teams to rape and pillage. Come one, come all.
-
A's get OF Hairston from Pads for minor leaguers - FOX Sports on MSN
The A's have acquired outfielder Scott Hairston from the San Diego Padres for minor-league pitchers Ryan Webb, Craig Italiano and a player to be named later. - Paul DePodesta:
While trading Scott is difficult and not without risk, especially given his excellent production this season, this move provides us with some young power arms with big upside - a real need for us - while also allowing for other young players to continue to amass Major League at-bats in our outfield.
-
Padres surprise Hairston in trade to A's | padres.com: News
That wasn't anything Hairston wanted to hear. He choked up when talking to reporters, especially when asked about his time in San Diego that began, ironically, in another July trade, this time in 2007 when he was acquired from the D-backs.
"Around this time of year, you're always thinking 'what if.' It happens. I've got to do my job somewhere else," Hairston said. "I came here, they gave me a chance. That's all I can ask. I appreciate that. I'll always remember it.
"It's not something that I wanted. But it doesn't matter what I want. Hopefully, I'll have the same kind of experience over there that I had here."
-
Hairston trade analysis " Another Padres Blog
The A’s get more of a sure thing in Hairston, and he’ll likely start in their outfield for the next few years. The Padres pick up three less-proven guys, but gain some players and service time. We’ll see how it works out. -
PADRES: Hairston traded to A's : North County Times - Californian 07-06-2009
"We're looking for some good arms, and that's one thing I think we lack in our system is pitching depth," Towers said. "We really didn't want to give up Scotty. He's probably been our most clutch hitter the past couple of years as well as protection for Adrian (Gonzalez). For us, this is more of a move looking forward, beyond this year. We need some arms for us to be successful."
[Note by jbox, 07/06/09 8:39 AM PDT ]
A's fans saying the PTBNL is Sean Gallagher.
0 recs |
118 comments
|
Comments
...And it's official.
See you guys in Peoria. Enjoy the summer.
by Padres in VA on Jul 5, 2009 7:33 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This sucks big, fat, huge donkey balls.
Hairston has been one of my favorite players since his acquisition.
by maestro876 on Jul 5, 2009 7:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
We got crappy minor leaguers for the 2nd best hitter on the team.
A clutch guy who loved being a Padre.
Wonderful.
by maestro876 on Jul 5, 2009 7:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
2nd best?
id say 1st best
DODGERS, RED SOX, YANKEES, BRONCOS, PATRIOTS and RAIDERS all suck. Especially the Dodgers.
by LJbumfool on Jul 6, 2009 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
not that i dont love A-Go
but his june numbers were pathetic
by 1210pads on Jul 6, 2009 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Numbers
June:
Scott Hairston: 38 PAs, 37 ABs, 2 HRs, 5 RBI, 10 Ks, .243/.243/.486
Adrian Gonzalez: 113 PAs, 81 ABs, 4 HRs, 8 RBI, 14 Ks, .235/.461/.469
July:
Scott Hairston: 23 PAs, 19 ABs, 1 HRs, 2 RBI, 4 Ks, .211/.348/.421
Adrian Gonzalez: 23 PAs, 19 ABs, 0 HRs, 3 RBI, 5 Ks, .158/.304/.211
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't believe this even being discussed.
by Drama on Jul 6, 2009 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A Go is our star
just needs to get it going again and losing Hairston wont help that
by 1210pads on Jul 6, 2009 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agone 3.4 WAR 1.56 WPA 28.8 VORP 969 OPS
Hairston 2.2 WAR 1.43 WPA 20.4 VORP 891 OPS
Fire Bud Black!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Jul 6, 2009 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think it means
do you research before trashing a player’s numbers
by 'Eaters on Jul 6, 2009 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
but a point that still warrants making
by 'Eaters on Jul 6, 2009 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
have you bee nsatisfied with adrian this last month
that was the only point being made
by 1210pads on Jul 6, 2009 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe that was the point you wanted to make
But what came across is that you thought he was/is not the best hitter on our team.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
WAR = Wins Above Replacement, basically the number additional wins a player provides.
WPA = Win Probability Added, basically how well each of their plate appearances has helped the team.
VORP = Value over Replacement Player, very similar to WAR, but without defensive value added in. 10 points of VORP is roughy equal to 1 win.
OPS = On Base Percentage Plus Slugging Percentage, a crude and overused simplification of hitting contribution using the two offensive stats that correlate the most with winning weighted equally (which is bad because OBP has been proven to be way more valuable that SLG).
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Above Replacement
has A-Go not started every game this year at first?
by 1210pads on Jul 6, 2009 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He started on game
at DH instead of 1B.
Replacement means the level at which your average AAAA player would play at adjusted for position (a AAAA 1B would be a better hitter than a AAAA CF, for example).
If you are trying to make the point that the given numbers for Adrian (with the exception of OPS) are aided by him playing more than Hairston, then you would be correct.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm just not sure how
Chris Burke wasn’t thrown in on a potential three-team deal with Kooz.
Hmm...a financial panther?
by friarinchicago on Jul 5, 2009 7:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Of Course they Did!
I’m sure we received more talent than we gave up, and we are not winning this year, but it still stings. An outfield of Venable Gwynn and Blanks is in our future with Kouzmanoff probably being shipped to the Mariners and Correia to the Rangers for a pitching machine and 3 bags of balls.
by Geomerzi on Jul 5, 2009 7:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
We got garbage in return
Webb has an opponent batting average of .313 in 45 AAA innings.
Italiano has an ERA of 5.63 in A ball.
Way to go boys.
by Padres in VA on Jul 5, 2009 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is alot worse then the proposed Peavy Trade
I’m sorry but there’s little to no upside in any of these pitchers for a guy who probably could’ve brought in more or, worse case scenario, kept up a piece of the outfield.
And yeah I know the future of the Pads is apparently Blanks (OK), Gwynn (GOOD) and Venable (IDK) but does that mean you get rid of one of your best hitters for that? Serious?
If that’s the case what do we hope to get for a Meredith or a Kouzmanoff or what?
by TheAxManCometh on Jul 5, 2009 8:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Still a bit perplexed by the deal for you guys
Webb/Italiano, I don’t care for. Potential middle relief to borderline setup arms (if they develop), imo. Everything depends on the PTBNL. Over at MLBTR
Corey Brock of MLB.com tells us that Padres GM Kevin Towers “sounded excited” about the player to be named later, who will be one of two pitchers in the A’s organization. One of these unnamed players reportedly has Major League service time.
Haven’t seen a Brock article that says that, but I haven’t been searching that hard. Anyhow, that’s on mlbtr. That makes me think Sean Gallagher is a possibility. If so, that makes the trade make a lot more sense for you guys. Gallagher hasn’t put it together yet, but has a live low-mid 90’s fastball, a good breaking ball, and a changeup that’s decent. He showed some promise last year, but he tailed off this year and is currently on the DL (for what, I don’t know). As a Cubs fan, I was a big fan of his coming up, and I still think he has 2/3 type potential in a rotation.
That said, the trade still doesn’t make the world’s sense for you guys. If the return is a Gallagher level arm, the trade is alright … but why not wait? Did they really need to shave some more money off? This is a seller’s market – already, it’s been noted that several teams were in on Hairston, due to his controlled years left and performance. Why not wait to see if it builds up?
by toonsterwu on Jul 5, 2009 8:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You're implying that the management in place has a lick of common sense
just be glad you’re not in our exclusive club… Padres for life.
"Get on board early," Black said, alluding to, what he feels, is a crop of up-and-coming players.
"I would tell those fans that we're going to play good baseball. We're going to play hard. We're going to have exciting young players..." -Bud Black
by The Kipper on Jul 5, 2009 8:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm TOTALLY reading between the lines
But the want DePo worded his post I got the feeling that he wanted to tell us about the PTBNL to help justify the deal, but is obligated to keep his mouth shut. I think the key to this deal is that we are getting a variety of arms back and the old adage says that if you want to develop a pitching prospect, get 5 of them. I don’t think anyone would want to give up this many arms that were also prospects for Hairston and that’s why they did the deal. Still, depending on who the third guy in the deal is, I’m not sure there would have been a better deal out there. Maybe a deal where we got back just one guy who was rated better than these, but that’s a little riskier and there’s no guarantee that the “higher rated” guy ends up better than any one of these 3. I still don’t really like losing Scotty considering that he’s pretty much the second best hitter in the lineup and won’t be a free agent for a couple more years.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 5, 2009 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A's fan here who lives in San Diego.
Took us by surprise, for sure. First thought was that this is a sign of an impending Holliday move, either with Hairston as Holliday’s replacement or by packaging the both together for a bigger return.
Webb is essentially AAAA filler, but Italiano isn’t a bad prospect. Electric stuff with a bad delivery. The A’s were trying him the rotation, but throwing him in the bullpen and fasttracking him to the big leagues might not be a bad idea. He dominated low-A ball last year before struggling in high-A, but again, he’s not a bad candidate for a bullpen move.
Of course, everything depends on the PTBNL.
by danmerqury on Jul 5, 2009 8:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
My god...
When is this team going to stop doing this. Trade major league talent for a bunch of unproven minor leaguers, all while refusing to trade any of our prospects the same way. Oh thats right because major league talent costs money, and minor league prospects are far cheaper. Some day this team will learn that while it is nice to build through a farm system, you will at some point have to spend a little to go anywhere. Until then we will be a farm system for guys to come through, play 1 or 2 good seasons, then get traded to contenders for more minor league pitchers with “good upside”
by Newtral77 on Jul 5, 2009 9:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe a good move
but it hurts.
Usually, when you get new management – they pony up and grab some exciting players – not deal off the few you have left.
Hairston was one of the most inspiring players (when he played). I’ll never forget his game winning hr’s right after he was sent here from AZ. He was cheap 1.5 mil and under control for 2.5 years. However, he is 29 and is hitting way above his average. He is often injured – so his trade value is at an all time high. Figure that Jake is gone, so we are short of arms…and our pitching coaches are miracle workers.
With no offense left – the next several months are going to be the dog days indeed.
"Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted."
Groucho Marx
by planetjeffy on Jul 5, 2009 9:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm gonna need a new avatar
Any suggestions?
by JollyWaffle on Jul 5, 2009 9:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
DePo says power arms?
According to the 2008 Baseball America Handbook Webb is rated……well he isn’t rated in the top 30 prospects despite being 22 when published last year. Upon digging he sounds Chris Young-ish….6’6" around 89-90 mph. Powerful indeed.
Craig Italiano is 23 and was ranked #30 prospect last year. Throws 98…..had shoulder reconstruction in 2006 for torn labrum. In 2007 had his skull cracked by a line drive and missed significant time….once again sounds Chris Young-ish.
The plus out of this whole deal is it means Blanks should stay rather than getting shuttled to Portland. Although I’m sure we’ll find a way to play Edgar in the outfield and further limit the development of our younger guys (Blanks,Venable).
www.avengingjackmurphy.blogspot.com/
I don't agree with a word you're saying but I'll defend to the death your right to say it" ~Patrick Henry
"Shut the fuck up Donnie, you're out of your element!" ~Walter Sobchak from The Big Lebowski
by AIChief on Jul 5, 2009 9:51 PM PDT reply actions 3 recs
to be fair
webb’s velo has been a bit better this year, more consistently in the low 90’s.
by toonsterwu on Jul 5, 2009 10:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd
The plus out of this whole deal is it means Blanks should stay rather than getting shuttled to Portland. Although I’m sure we’ll find a way to play Edgar in the outfield and further limit the development of our younger guys (Blanks,Venable).
Rec’d for that.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Jul 6, 2009 5:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Patience my young padawans
Fire Bud Black!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Jul 5, 2009 10:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Info
Ryan Webb
Sacramento River Cats Media Guide
Craig Italiano
Stockton Ports Media Guide
If you want it.
www.avengingjackmurphy.blogspot.com/
I don't agree with a word you're saying but I'll defend to the death your right to say it" ~Patrick Henry
"Shut the fuck up Donnie, you're out of your element!" ~Walter Sobchak from The Big Lebowski
by AIChief on Jul 5, 2009 10:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
...and I thought I couldn't hate my life any more.
Fuck this; I’m goin’ to the bar.
www.FriarsOnCardboard.blogspot.com
"jbox does not drink coffee, as it makes him clean house big time." ~Kev
by TheThirdGonzalez on Jul 5, 2009 10:21 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
save me a seat
Chicks Dig a Low ERA Bullpen.
by eastbaysd on Jul 6, 2009 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right on my lap!
www.FriarsOnCardboard.blogspot.com
"jbox does not drink coffee, as it makes him clean house big time." ~Kev
by TheThirdGonzalez on Jul 6, 2009 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you, idiot management.....
Thank you to tightwad John Moores, the charred remains of Sandy Alderson, the King of Empty Promises Kevin Towers, and Major-League Failure Paul DePodesta.
This trade officially makes us the Pittsburgh Pirates of the NL West.
Thanks for nothing. Get the hell out.
by FLM on Jul 5, 2009 10:46 PM PDT reply actions 3 recs
If you wanna start a firing spree...
then let’s start with Kevin Towers, a man who chops potential franchise players and fan favorites…The Padres are nothing more than a minor league team at the major league level…hell, don’t fire Towers, demote him to Lake Elsinore and have him groom those guys for our MLB team! This guy makes me sick, it’s the same stupid cycle every year. Groom a guy with potential, sell when he’s hot, suck all over again. If I’m Adrian, I’m looking to get traded to an organization that WANTS to win! (organization not managers and players) This crap makes me sick, look at me, I joined this damn blog so I could have a voice. I almost want to show up to the next game in the opponents uni, my next favorite Padre is probably headed their way without knowing…!
by FireTowers2Day on Jul 5, 2009 11:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Here we go again
Wow, we gave up a 30 year old 4th outfielder for 3 young arms. They could end up being nothing but that’s why you stockpile arms; in hopes of getting a good one. We have a ton of young bats that can play outfield coming in the next couple years. We need more young power arms.
Fire Bud Black!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Jul 5, 2009 11:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If we have too...
Come on guys, you know the drill, Moores is still the owner of this team. He still has his cost cutting measures in effect. It was bound to happen. Every vet we have is not safe, and for one I am ok with it. If we are going to lose since we have no pitching, at least give the kids their shot, see what we have. Not a cup of tea, but a legit shot at showing themselves. The Padres are not going to be good or exciting this year, but we knew that from the start, their play has been way above what we all thought they were going to do. Placeholders are something for the short term now we have to see if they can be replaced in the long term.
I know a lot of us are underwhelmed with the deal for Hairston, as he was our second biggest threat in the lineup. But we got a chance at some guys that could work at, and some thing that the PTBNL is the key to the deal, which might be nice. But remember, Hairston wasnt going to be part of the next contending Padres team (that means the FO doesnt believe we will compete til 2012, so either we extend or trade Adrian, which worries the hell out of me) so moving him when he was worth 3 pitchers with upside isnt a bad move. Especially when you consider they should be around when they Padres should be able to compete. But it does make the next 2 years look really bleak.
by AirmanSD on Jul 5, 2009 11:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Thank you, Scott Hairston, for everything
Your service to this organization has been excellent, and you maintained a level of play so that the team was able to trade you for something valuable, so that one day, us Padre fans may enjoy a winning team again. For this, I thank you, Scotty.
Dear Kouz and Briles, you could learn something from him. Hint hint.
Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you? ◔ヮ◔
Uncommon Sportsman :: Absurdity in play
by Axion on Jul 5, 2009 11:47 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
It’s got to be Gallagher. He’s on the DL which is why he’s the PTBNL. He’s got #2 upside and would do well at Petco. Italiano also has potential. He’s got a nasty hook and good velocity. His stuff is there, it’s just his command that needs work. If the Pads don’t want Gallagher they’ll probably have a choice of Eveland or Simmons who are #4 type innings eaters.
by DavidS on Jul 5, 2009 11:48 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I feel sick
Hariston was my favorite pad. The PTBNL better be huge otherwise this trade is unforgiveable. And i doubt a Harri would fetch a top prospect
by 1210pads on Jul 6, 2009 12:22 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey 'lampers.
yes, it’s another A’s fan. Don’t worry, Beans didn’t swipe the site in trade. We’re not invading. Promise. Us A’s fans have been pondering the PTBNL. The prevailing thought is Sean Gallagher. He’s been in Beane’s doghouse, but he’s got wicked stuff. He’s on the DL, but he’s one of the A’s most promising pitchers. He was the centerpiece of the Rich Harden deal, after all. So don’t judge the trade just yet; we sure aren’t. Time will tell on this one.
I don't always blog. But when I do, I prefer AN. Stay thirsty my friends.
by Kallus on Jul 6, 2009 2:23 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If we're going to go young
hell – dump Adrian, Bell, Jake, Chris and load up on prospects.
"Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted."
Groucho Marx
by planetjeffy on Jul 6, 2009 2:55 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Eh
I take this as a panic move. KT couldn’t find any takers for Kouz, doesn’t want to give up on Headley and isn’t yet ready to send Blanks down. This opens up more time in LF for Headley and more time in CF for Gwynn.
What I don’t get is how the Padres don’t even know how to rebuild. I know nobody is going to come to the games if there’s no stars around, but keeping Peavy, Young and Gonzalez around is eventually going to end with San Diego getting a lesser value in a trade during the last year of the player’s contract. I just read an article in ESPN magazine where A-Gon said “I’m just going to play out the rest of my contract with the Padres” one too many times for comfort. I hate to say it, but a firesale is in order if you’re going to call it quits on this season.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Jul 6, 2009 5:10 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I don't think that's necessarily so.
I think they are still working on trading Kouz. All the reports have been that they’re in negotiations with Seattle who desperately needs a 3B. I would not be surprised to see Kouz head there soon.
Peavy can’t be traded until next year thanks to his injury. Maybe the organization should have pulled the trigger this past off-season, but that train has left the station for the time being.
I don’t think they are going to trade Adrian. They see him as their franchise player, given his production and his ties to the community.
Young is cheap and not valuable enough to get good returns in a trade. I’d not expect them to trade him either.
So the only other trade I’d expect to see this year is Kouzmanoff. Which can’t come a moment too soon in my opinion.
by maestro876 on Jul 6, 2009 9:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just read all of the comments
and your most spot on, John. If we’re not planning on contending until Moores’ divorce becomes final, then sell everything and make a solid plan for the future! I know it’s a balancing act from a financial standpoint and that you have to sell tickets, but eternal mediocrity isn’t exactly a way to keep your fan base happy either. Sandy had the wool pulled over our eyes in 2006 and 2007, but we know now that these are dark days indeed.
"Get on board early," Black said, alluding to, what he feels, is a crop of up-and-coming players.
"I would tell those fans that we're going to play good baseball. We're going to play hard. We're going to have exciting young players..." -Bud Black
by The Kipper on Jul 6, 2009 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
One of my favorite guys to watch the last 2 years
It’s terrible to see Scotty go.
by goose1 on Jul 6, 2009 6:59 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Both
teams are out of it (A’s, Padres). Wonder if the A’s plan on flipping him?
vr, Xei
by Xeifrank on Jul 6, 2009 7:47 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This is a bummer move.
I agree with goose1 that Scotty was one of my favorite guys to see come up to the plate. He has really come into his own in the field, too.
BUT, Xeifrank is also right that the Padres are long out of this race anyway, AND let’s face it: our starting rotation isn’t the most formidable group of five guys on the planet. With Peavy and Young down, the idea of facing our starting pitching doesn’t quite strike fear into the opposing team (and when he was healthy, even CY hadn’t exactly been pitching what you would call “lights-out” baseball this year). When your “Ace” is Kevin Correia—who I’ll admit has been surpirsingly sharp lately—you’ve got problems. I like Chad Guadin when he has good control, but he has a tendency to be erratic. Josh Banks is average, at best. And Josh Geer and Walter Silva just bring two words to my mind: “batting practice”.
So maybe we’ll at least get someone as our PTBNL who can really beef up our rotation. On the other hand, don’t we still have Will Inman and Matt Latos? Why can’t we give them a shot at some innings? Especially Latos, who I understand has really been pitching well in SA.
And hey…..what about Brian Lawrence??
by Mr. Meadows on Jul 6, 2009 8:47 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Latos is not ready.
First of all, they want to limit his innings. He didn’t pitch a whole lot last year because of injury, and the general rule of thumb you follow with young pitchers is no more than twice the innings pitched one year to the next. For Latos, he only threw 56 innings in 2008, and he’s at 67 for 2009. That means he’s only got 40 or so innings left in him this year. They’ve been limiting his outings in AA right now to 4-5 per start. We may see him for a few starts later this year, but not many, and those not for very long.
Second of all, he hasn’t been nearly as dominating his last few starts as he was when the year started. The hitters are adjusting to him, and he needs to learn to use more than just his fastball to get guys out. His breaking stuff isn’t all the way there yet.
Inman is just getting lit up in AAA. You don’t want to see him yet.
by maestro876 on Jul 6, 2009 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If the PTBNL is Sean Gallagher
and he pans out, then I could swallow this trade. He’s got a lot of potential, and was pitching very well in AAA before he got hurt. Once he gets better, if we get him, I’d like to see him in San Diego so he can take his lumps this year and maybe start to get good for next year.
by maestro876 on Jul 6, 2009 9:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Gallagher Scouting Report
I think this was before his shaky time with the Cubs and A’s, but the guy makes an argument that Gallagher is similar to Peavy. Funny story about why Gallagher was drafted so low also.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Jul 6, 2009 9:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just cant see the A's
giving up a top prospect for Hairy
by 1210pads on Jul 6, 2009 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
One thing to note
is that the report says that they had to wait and see if he held up at AAA. Which he has. Better than any pithcing prospect we’ve had for a while.
by maestro876 on Jul 6, 2009 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The As like Hairston.
They tried to trade for him from the D-Backs a few years ago before we did. You have to give up value to get value. Gallagher isn’t ace quality, but he’s got the potential to be a #2-3, especially in PETCO. And it’s #2-3 that we need.
by maestro876 on Jul 6, 2009 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
if the PTBNL is Gallagher
then i will begrudgingly be ok with this trade. hell i loved scotty as much as the next guy, but we can’t keep everybody that we love until the end of time. moves need to be made from time to time, and if Gallagher is part of this deal it may help us in the long run.
if he isnt, hand me a pitchfork and torch and i’ll join you guys in the management witchhunt first thing.
"I suggest more bike" ~KSK
www.throughbucknerslegs.com
by justdave on Jul 6, 2009 10:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
what makes gallegher so good
he hasnt been able to hack it in the majors
by 1210pads on Jul 6, 2009 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's got very little major league experience.
He’s succeeded at every minor league level. He’s got talent. If he can get it together and keep it together, he projects as a #2-3 guy.
by maestro876 on Jul 6, 2009 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is more to evaluating a pitcher than using a small sample size of major league service time
Scouts like his stuff and command. However, the way I’ve heard it the last few years is that while most scouts agree that he’s a major league caliber starter (especially in the National League and especially at Petco Park), there’s no consensus about how good he could be. I saw an A’s fan mention #2 starter potential. I haven’t heard that since he was in the low minors. I think Gallagher could step in and become an adequate #3 or #4 guy. We need those type of arms down the road, probably more than we need Hairston’s bat (especially as he gets into his 30s). But, it still doesn’t make it feel any better right now. Losing Hairston hurts Padres fans more than it helps the A’s get better. And that’s the main reason this trade doesn’t feel good. However, it’s not like this is a case of “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. The Padres are broken and they need to be fixed and it’s obvious that the organization doesn’t see that as a fix that can be made done in 2009, so keeping an eye on the future is the only way to get a winning team in San Diego again.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Think we'll see him in San Diego as soon as the trade goes through?
Assuming that we do in fact get him, and he’s healthy. Can’t see much good in leaving him in AAA more than a couple rehab starts. If we want him to be part of the future, best get him up here and have him start learning and going through growing pains now.
by maestro876 on Jul 6, 2009 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's either him or Walter Silva
who’d you rather have starting???? I think that answers your question right there.
www.400in94.wordpress.com
by SDPads_1 on Jul 6, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
Yes, it does.
Plus, I think the Padres will feel obligated to bring him. Suffice it to say that even if the return wasn’t Gallagher and it was another AAA pitcher with previous major league service time, they’d probably still bring him up for three reasons:
1. The A’s prospects at AAA are more talented than a number of pitchers currently the majors
2. To justify the trade
3. To stop spinning there wheels with guys who aren’t cutting the mustard (like Silva).
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two words if it is Gallagher...
Darren Balsley. DB is a magician.
www.avengingjackmurphy.blogspot.com/
I don't agree with a word you're saying but I'll defend to the death your right to say it" ~Patrick Henry
"Shut the fuck up Donnie, you're out of your element!" ~Walter Sobchak from The Big Lebowski
by AIChief on Jul 6, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
When I learned of the trade, I made this face
![]()
Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you? ◔ヮ◔
Uncommon Sportsman :: Absurdity in play
by Axion on Jul 6, 2009 12:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I was updating my roster page
and realized our current payroll is damn low now…..
trading Kouz doesn’t really save us any money right now too but he’ll be gone soon with Eckstein, Correia or LRod being the next to go.
www.400in94.wordpress.com
by SDPads_1 on Jul 6, 2009 12:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Trading Kouz
saves us money next year. He becomes arbitration eligible following this season. Trading Scott Hairston does the same. The Hairston trade lowers the payroll by about 625K (half season of 1.5 mill), however, his replacement we can assume will be a league minimum guy at about a 400K salary or 200K for the rest of the season. So, the total savings is probably only 400K for 2009. Just based off of glancing at a handful of major league starting position players who either went through arbitration or had their second year of arbitration bought out, he’s due to make $4-5 million in 2010. Kouz is probably due $2 million. Gwynn, Blanks, Headley, Cabrera, Hundley and Venable will all make close to the minimum in 2010.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Frees up money to sign expensive draft picks not otherwise taken
Or to sign a big Dominican prospect which we’ve already proven we have pull with.
Fire Bud Black!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Jul 6, 2009 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Eckstein will go anywhere this year.
They don’t have anyone else to play 2B. To me, it’s up in the air as to whether or not they decide to bring him back next year, which they could if they decide they’re finished with Antonelli, and if Sogard isn’t ready.
Correia they will probably keep because he’s relatively cheap and a San Diego guy. He’s a good option to have to fill out the back end of the rotation, especially considering he’s underperforming his career norms right now.
LRod isn’t going anywhere because he’s cheap and there’s no one else to play shortstop if something happens to Cabrera again.
by maestro876 on Jul 6, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Using Eckstein
Or using LRod/EGon is basically no different if you are not interested in what your record is for the current season. Well, maybe Eck puts more butts in seats, but that’s debateable. It would seem to me that if someone wants to offer a minor league pitcher that has a chance at making the majors in exchange for Eck, we’ll take it and piecemeal together a 2B for the last 2 months of the season.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Similar thinkng
As with trading Greg Maddux last year. We didn’t really have anyone to replace him either, but we did it anyway.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
With Maddux, we needed/wanted to dump salary.
Plus with Eckstein, he does actually contribute in terms of RiSP hitting. Basically, he seems to be the only guy on the team who can do it. Also if we think we have a shot at next year I would want to have Eck on the team. Say we call up a guy like Sogard, we could use Eck as a spot-starter, pinch hitter, and mentor for the younger infielders. A large part of his contribution to the team seems to be as a a locker-room presence. Of course, that’s assuming he’s will to take that role, which he may not be. Again though, if we feel we can compete next year we may want to try and bring him back to start for that reason.
Just musings, of course.
by maestro876 on Jul 6, 2009 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't consider Maddux a salary dump
The money saved was not very large, however it was much larger than Eckstein.
All those qualities you mention about Eckstein won’t help the team win in any year other than 2009, and as the Hairston trade shows, the organization is not too concerned with wins and losses in 2009. Thus, all those attributes, however wonderful, are essentially immaterial when considering whether or not to trade him. The biggest reason I can see not to trade him is that because of his low salary, there is no reason to go fishing for a deal. But, if some team comes knocking with a prospect, then I don’t see any of those reasons you give keeping the Padres from doing a deal.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why couldn't Eck's attributes help in 2010?
Do you expect a big fall-off? I thought if anything, he was underperforming his career numbers.
by maestro876 on Jul 6, 2009 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
People underperform their career numbers when they are 34
If anything, this season has been a surprise.
His career OPS+ is 88. His OPS+ this season is 88. To match that career number at 34 is very rare.
by brewer090 on Jul 6, 2009 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Concur on your analysis regarding Eck
BTW, great job on this thread as far as high baseball IQ/ analysis. I have probably never liked an underperforming (based on past numbers) Padres signing/acquisition more that I have liked what Eckstein has brought in 09. Even he if continues to slightly slip w/ age in 2010, to me he is a no brainer to get back here next year. He could have easily been what Keith Lockhart was awhile back, but he thankfully wasn’t.
by texpadre on Jul 6, 2009 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay I see the problem here
Eck is only on a one year contract. If you trade him, it in no way precludes him from playing for the Padres in 2010 and keeping him in no way guarantees he stays with the Padres in 2010. You seem to assume that I am making a judgement about his 2010 production. I am not. I am just assuming that becoming a free agent in 2010 means that you cannot be counted on to be a part of the team in 2010.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I knew he had a 1-year deal.
I just assumed that if they traded him, it would be a lot less likely that they’d bring him back again next year. I remember when we traded Randy Wolf last year there was a lot of talk about wanting to bring him back in this year, and I thought that was a good idea. But then he went and signed with the Dodgers. Guess I was just assuming the same thing would happen with Eckstein were he to be traded.
by maestro876 on Jul 6, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But, even with Randy Wolf
He still could have signed with the Dodgers if we had kept him through the whole season and we wouldn’t have been able to take a shot with Reineke (for whatever that is worth). As an organization, it’s better assume that the player has no loyalty to you once free agency starts and plan accordingly, otherwise the player ends up walking and all you got from him was two extra months of work on a team that probably would have lost just as much without him as with him.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wolf for Reineke trade
has been as putrid a KT deal as you’ll find. Wolf continues to produce at a nice level and Reineke was a dead, beached whale the moment he showed up here.
by texpadre on Jul 6, 2009 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So what's your problem with it?
What would the Padres have accomplished in 2009 with Wolf instead of Reineke. Only one thing, more money in Wolf’s pockets from the Padres instead of the Astros. It’s not really a putrid trade if you didn’t lose anything important in the deal, is it?
Wolf would still be Dodger even if we didn’t trade him. And the Padres would have still finished with 90+ losses. Actually, if Wolf had pitched more for us, it might have cost us Donovan Tate.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 5:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
point taken but...
I am not arguing that we should have kept Wolf, but by god could we have gotten some better and younger talent for Wolf than an older ‘on the downside’ prospect like Reineke ? By the way. didn’t we lose a decent trading chip in Wolf ? Is that something something "important " to lose ?
by texpadre on Jul 6, 2009 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
As much as I like Randy Wolf
he sucked for us last year. Not sure what else he could have gotten us.
by maestro876 on Jul 6, 2009 10:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So 24hrs later
and this trade still sucks and most people are smacking us around for making such a dumb move
yep, sounds pretty right
by TheAxManCometh on Jul 6, 2009 1:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
most people are idoits
Smoke big green, call it Bruce Banner
by CurbEnthusiasm on Jul 6, 2009 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
and most idoits can't spell idiots?
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes
Smoke big green, call it Bruce Banner
by CurbEnthusiasm on Jul 6, 2009 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's the french way of spelling it
pronounced like, “eed-wah”.
by Dex on Jul 6, 2009 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Most people can spell
and most people see that trading your top outfielders for a bag of balls and “OMG a PTBNL with MAJOR LEAGUE EXPERIENCE
” is the textbook definition of idiotic
by TheAxManCometh on Jul 6, 2009 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see how you can make that statement
You don’t know that the Padres didn’t get anything useful back, just like we don’t know how well Scotty will play as he gets more expensive and gets older. Selling high on a guy is probably not the textbook definition of idiotic.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sad, disheartening, annoying? Yes.
Idiotic? No.
Bottom line, Padres need arms more than they need OF bats. Especially OF bats about to turn 30 and are having career years for a losing team.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
top outfielder=
30 year old 4th outfield
Fire Bud Black!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Jul 6, 2009 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rob Neyer on the deal:
by brewer090 on Jul 6, 2009 1:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
My only problem with Hairston is that he’s 29 and has a .313 career on-base percentage. Yes, this season it’s .358 … but last season it was .312 in significantly more plate appearances than he’s got this season (so far). My only concern is that Hairston’s been (roughly) a National League-average hitter, which means he’ll be a less than American League-average hitter.
Of course, he is cheap and he does play well in the outfield, so he’s still worth a roster spot for sure. Oh, one more concern: the A’s have three young outfielders who have failed miserably to this point, but still deserve chances to play and probably need them because the A’s need some great players (at the moment they don’t have even one). In the long run, who loses playing time to Hairston? Ryan Sweeney? Travis Buck? Aaron Cunningham?
Perhaps none of them. Ken Rosenthal says the A’s aren’t going to flip Hairston. I’m not so sure. They could trade him soon, when his value’s at its highest. Or they could trade him a year from now, when he’s got a .298 on-base percentage and suddenly their young outfielders are looking pretty good by comparison. But I don’t see Hairston in the lineup when the A’s get back into the playoffs.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would have liked this trade better
if it included us sending Termell Sledge to the A’s for a guy named Gallagher. And watermelons.
Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you? ◔ヮ◔
Uncommon Sportsman :: Absurdity in play
by Axion on Jul 6, 2009 2:33 PM PDT reply actions 5 recs
And immediately after that
The Giants would have a followup trade acquiring some ponchos and tarps.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 6, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Missed out on this news, having apparently been in a cave for the last couple of days,
Logically, this might pay off in the end for the Padres, but right now, it sucks. So long, Scotty.
"2009 Padres.....Yeah, we're still here.
by Boilermaker19 on Jul 6, 2009 5:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Logic?
The “logic” of the Padres trading their best players for a later success never pays off. I have been a Padre fan for 32 years and this type of Padre mentality started back when my favorite rookie was Dave Winfield. I was only eleven years old at the time but knew the Padres were making a mistake back then…and obviously nothing has changed!
by sandiegosportslover on Jul 6, 2009 5:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
My god
I cannot believe what I am seeing. I leave you bitches alone for half a season and the place falls to crap.
For everyone bitching about this move, please. Hairston put up gaudy numbers, but they were mostly counting stats. He had a tendency to swing at bad pitches around his eyes (see many ABs over this weekend) and was probably playing above his means this year. Hell, I remember last year when SI wrote an article saying that Hairston had solved our CF problem. And, another thing, the dude was injury prone (like my poor, broken robot).
So, bitching about “what we got”? Well, we got two dudes that throw in the mid 90s. You can pretty much count they number of guys in our system capable of doing that with both hands. We NEED pitching. In case people haven’t figured it out by now, pitching is kind of one of the big reasons we did well earlier this decade. Pitching and defense, and enough hitting. We never lit the world on fire with the bat, but our relievers usually kept us in games. The past two years, this has not been the case.
I disagree with those who claim that this trade will hinge on the PTBNL. I think that sweetens the pot, but I also think this was a move the team had to make. Everyone and their brother knew Scotty was going to be traded in the next few weeks (many people thought he was being showcased in CF, which is why little T played right), and KT deemed the trade to be a smart move.
As for those complaining that we “always ditch the popular guys for crap”, I present the following:
Akinori Otsuka (who was much beloved) yielded us Adrian Gonzalez and Chris Young. That trade obviously blew up in our faces.
Phil Nevin for Chan Ho Park Debatable on how much Nev was liked, but CHP was a pretty significant piece for us down the stretch after we acquired him.
Jody Gerut for Tony Gwynn Obviously it’s a bit early to judge this one, but early returns are promising.
And the hardest thing I’ve ever had to admit on this board:
Khalil Greene for pitching Somebody obviously predicted something about Khalil’s mental state and made a move that has improved the team. Luke Greggorson has pitched passably and people are high on Worrel. Yet, even with them both having been hurt this year, both of them have outperformed my beloved shortstop.
So, let’s all remember that we have jaundiced memories that only include those events that match our current moods. This team cannot afford to deal in sentimentality, and they’ve often made unpopular, but shrewd moves. We’re still waiting on how some of the other trades pan out (I think that Inman will work out and Thatcher shows fleeting flashes of competency).
Anyway, had some time for a change so I thought I’d say hey. I got a new role at work and I’m actually busy, which seriously hampers my blogging time. Between that and pursuing my MBA, there hasn’t been much time for debate. I’ll try to be a little more present in the next few months.
by Phantom on Jul 6, 2009 6:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
this is about Khalil isn't it?
"Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!"
by Ron Mexico on Jul 6, 2009 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
He walked right into that one
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 7, 2009 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Forget about the players involved for a minute
because the most important aspect of this trade is clearing the logjam in the OF so that the younger guys can be evaluated. When a season is on the down slide and the stock is high on a 30 year old who’s never really played a full season the time to evaluate players for next season has arrived. I really like Scott Hairston but we have to see if Venable can play. We also need to get Blanks ready to be the starter next year.
With any luck the pitchers will pan out……like they did in the Linebrink trade…..(I’ve never seen a player get optioned more than Joe Thatcher).
www.avengingjackmurphy.blogspot.com
I don't agree with a word you're saying but I'll defend to the death your right to say it" ~Patrick Henry
"Shut the fuck up Donnie, you're out of your element!" ~Walter Sobchak from The Big Lebowski
by AIChief on Jul 6, 2009 8:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hmm
Any truth to the rumor that Jeff Moorad is now trying to buy the As so he can force them to trade Hairston again?
by kishi on Jul 6, 2009 8:30 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I love Shrek...
but you have to admit that these guys we’re getting are better than Leo Rosales.
www.FriarsOnCardboard.blogspot.com
"jbox does not drink coffee, as it makes him clean house big time." ~Kev
by TheThirdGonzalez on Jul 6, 2009 10:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You can't argue with that.
Memo to baseball managers: You manufacture runs by NOT making outs, not by making them on purpose.
by Wonko on Jul 7, 2009 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now I feel validated.
www.FriarsOnCardboard.blogspot.com
"jbox does not drink coffee, as it makes him clean house big time." ~Kev
by TheThirdGonzalez on Jul 7, 2009 1:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looks like they are writing off ‘09 &’10
by Heywood Jablome on Jul 7, 2009 9:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs





















