Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Pictures: An Axion PSA

Take it from me, pictures, when executed correctly, can add greatly to the value, entertainment, and enjoyment of any thread. But a poorly executed picture can be an eyesore and a technical strain. Here is what I hope to call a tutorial for posting images in Open Threads.

Star-divide

First of all, let's take a look at the code provided by the Insert Picture button (the little tree above the comment field):

 

I know, it's freaky, but don't worry, I'll hold your hand.

  • The < tells the HTML code, "Hey dudes, some code is about to start!"
  • img src means "image source" -- you're about to display an image!
  • The = is telling the HTML, "Hey look, this is what it's equal to!"
  • The " signifies the start of the important part
  • The host is where the image lives on the Internet, more on this below
  • The image name is the name of the image! Imagine that! Other users will be able to see this, so keep that in mind.
  • The *** is the type of file you're posting. You want this to be .jpg, .gif, .png -- Not .bmp, it's usually too large.
  • The latter " ends the important part
  • The final > closes the code. Show's over, people.

Now, using this format will place the image in its entirety in your comment. But if you just linked six megapixels of Steve Quis's ass on a box, 'Ballers are going to have to hit the scroll wheel on their mouse like three times to get past your comment. No thank you, I'll leave the strenuous activity to the athletes. So how do we display that large image in a way that it fits within the reasonable confines of a comment? Height tags, my dear Watson!

 

Throwing in a height tag like above will set a limit for how the tall the image will be displayed. The width with be automatically corrected as to not distort the picture, and since all threads are displayed vertically, limiting the height makes sense. The number is represented in pixels, and I find 150 to be a good baseline for most square images; 300 for images that are a lot taller than they are wide. Once you've added that, hit your Preview button and check the layout. Adjust your height value as necessary. Now you should have a perfectly concise displayed image.

Hosting: To be seen on the Internet, your image needs a home; called a host. Upload your image to a Photobucket, Flickr, Imageshack, tinypic, or whatever you prefer; these are hosts. If direct image paths are not provided by your host, or the image is hosted somewhere else on the web, simply right-click an image and (Firefox users) click 'Copy Image Location' (IE users) 'Copy Shortcut' to copy the image path to your clipboard. Then click the little tree icon above the comment field and paste by hitting CTRL + V where it says 'Enter the URL' as normal. If you are linking an image that is not hosted by you or on an account you own, the image may not last forever!

Please comment with any questions I didn't cover or am not clear about!

This FanPost was written by a member of the Gaslamp Ball community and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Gaslamp Ball managers or SB Nation.

Comment 14 comments  |  7 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Around SB Nation

Pitch f/x Primers

Jun 2009 from Beyond the Box Score - 14 comments

The Cups Overfloweth

Feb 2010 from 7500 To Holte - 1 comment

What a Boring Weekend

Apr 2010 from 7500 To Holte - 0 comments

Comments

Display:

does this mean

i can only upload images that are on the internet?

DODGERS, RED SOX, YANKEES, BRONCOS, PATRIOTS and RAIDERS all suck. Especially the Dodgers.

by LJbumfool on Apr 20, 2009 8:17 PM PDT reply actions  

No

You can upload pictures from your computer to your host.

I want to thank the good Lord for making me a Philip Rivers fan.

by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Apr 20, 2009 8:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

DODGERS, RED SOX, YANKEES, BRONCOS, PATRIOTS and RAIDERS all suck. Especially the Dodgers.

by LJbumfool on Apr 20, 2009 8:20 PM PDT reply actions  

i did it!

DODGERS, RED SOX, YANKEES, BRONCOS, PATRIOTS and RAIDERS all suck. Especially the Dodgers.

by LJbumfool on Apr 20, 2009 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

DODGERS, RED SOX, YANKEES, BRONCOS, PATRIOTS and RAIDERS all suck. Especially the Dodgers.

by LJbumfool on Apr 20, 2009 8:31 PM PDT reply actions  

i did it again!

thanks Axion

DODGERS, RED SOX, YANKEES, BRONCOS, PATRIOTS and RAIDERS all suck. Especially the Dodgers.

by LJbumfool on Apr 20, 2009 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

an ’tec

DODGERS, RED SOX, YANKEES, BRONCOS, PATRIOTS and RAIDERS all suck. Especially the Dodgers.

by LJbumfool on Apr 20, 2009 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

please tell me this picture is reversed and CY wasn’t leading with his right hand… They should practice this sort of thing in Spring Training.

by Stephen (shaynes41) on Apr 21, 2009 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

No....

it’s the Corey Haim stuff. Please, Drama. This is a baseball blog. Not a Drama free-for-all.

by Dalton on Apr 21, 2009 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

USE THE PREVIEW BUTTON

Well done, Axion! If you would be so kind as to allow me to add…

Many websites disallow hotlinking (read: linking to an image hosted on someone else’s server), and have automatic protection for it, some civil, but some not so much (read: usually involving rectums, and/or excrement with plenty of vulgar comments busting you for hotlinking).

So if you really are going to hotlink someone else’s images in the heat of an awesome open-thread conversation, because you’re too lazy to download, resize, re-upload to your own host, PLEASE use the PREVIEW button to make sure that the hotlink works.

Otherwise, if you prematurely hit post, and expect to see your hilariously awesome picture of Heath Bell doing his impression of the Wii-fit girl, you’ll instead end up with something like this, and people will call you a n00b and laugh at you and/or shake their heads disappointingly behind the anonymity of their computer screens.

Also #1, this isn’t foolproof either – your browser’s cache might continue to show the image after everything checks out on your end, but for those who didn’t cache it originally might get the denied-hotlink image while you can’t see. You’ll know when you get about three people going FAIL, EPIC FAIL, or NOOB.

Also #2, even if it does work, 9 times out of 10, you’ll go back to an old OT, and be unable to find the image, because after a long enough time, whomever runs the server’s going to eventually find out and/or apply some anti-hotlinking updates or whatnot.

No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.

by royhobbs on Apr 21, 2009 11:27 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Thank you

Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you? ◔ヮ◔
Uncommon Sportsman :: Absurdity in play

by Axion on Apr 21, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Cognitively aware of the San Diego Padres since about 1980-1981... Fans since '76.
Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Kinghippo_small Dex

Untitled_small jbox

Faith Keeper

P1230002_small jodes0405