Being a fan: Loyalty to the players or the organization?
What makes you a better fan? Being loyal to the players on your team or looking out for the best interest of the ball club? From what I've heard that's where most fans are having trouble with this Peavy trade.
I usually just try to remain a fan of the current ball club and try not to get wrapped up in any group of players. However, I'm only a fan of the organizations on-field activity. I'm certainly not a fan that is rooting for a teams financial well being by hoping they make a nice profit. Let the team worry about that while I'm being entertained.
In any case certain players come along that transcend the organization and become the face of the team. Gwynn is the best example but the issue arises when dealing with Hoffman and Peavy right now. Are we bad Padres fans if we want to see Hoffman signed to a short contract and Peavy traded in order for the club to get better or are we bad Padres fans because the club can't look towards a competitive future because we are too loyal to individual players? Either way I feel like a bad Padres fan, because I'm really starting not to care either way.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sandy's in your brain now.
…hard to say what his plan is here, but I think it involves breaking us all down boot-camp style… Letting us suffer through 99 losses. Keeping us guessing at all times on payroll, player contracts, and the fences…. being Sandy’s customer is mentally exhausting.
I will forever have faith in the Friar, but these next couple of years will test my fortitude. I still believe there’s a chance for a championship on Sandy’s watch, but I feel like I’ll be scarfing down a lot more dollar dogs before we get it done.
Stay loyal to those who reciprocate it.
It’s not a one way street. Besides Peavy basically being a lights out pitcher, I’ve been loyal to him because of his seemingly genuine desire to please the fans. He pitches his heart out because he wants to bring a championship to San Diego. He has been very candid about wanting to stay in SD even though he knows he could make more elsewhere.
That being said, ideally I want to be loyal to the organization; but I want the organization to be loyal to me. When KT is talking “wholesale changes” back in May and nothing really happens, then I’m kind of left believing that he is just paying lip service to the fan base. When Edmonds is the big off-season signing, again, I’m not thinking loyalty, I’m thinking lip service. I don’t expect SD to win a championship every year, after all, I’m not a Yankees or a Red Sox fan, but I do expect an earnest effort. I know next year will be rough, and I’m OK with that. I think that is why I’m OK with trading Peavy is the organization becomes better for it. But if I Peavy traded for 3 Braves fans to be named later, I’m through.
I’ll stay loyal to SD as long as I see the organization trying to move in the right direction.
by sacpadre on Nov 6, 2008 10:30 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
You're loyal to the team
which is a weird combination of the organization and the players. No matter what, I’m always going to be a San Diego Padres fan. There have been too many fond memories and too many players that I’ve loved as Padres to ever turn on the team. Even now, when I think of Finley, Cammy, Wally, and some others, I always think of them as Padres. And that makes me happy.
As for this coming season, I’m really struggling to get excited about it. Losing Vasgersian and likely Peavy and Khalil is a punch in the guy. Of course, we may get players back in that trade that will make the team better. And ultimately, when the team is winning, it’s a lot easier to get excited. Who knows, we could get a player back that the fan base can latch onto and adore like they do Jake and Khalil.
Look, I always hope that the team is going to be good and that there’s going to be players I like supporting. But there’s no guarantee that either will happen all of the time, or even half of the time. We were lucky in the late ’80s and early ’90s that we had Tony to keep us interested. No matter what, we had a legitimate superstar who loved playing for the team.
And maybe that’s the key. If we lose Jake, who do we glom around? Adrian is a great player, but he doesn’t really seem to want that role. Who would step up and make us want to come to the games, even if next year ends up like last year?
So yeah, I totally understand the conundrum. I’ll be a Padres fan next year (though not a season ticket holder) and I’ll still go to games, watch them online, and buy their merchandise. But it won’t be with quite the same fervor or excitement as year’s past.
by Phantom on Nov 6, 2008 10:44 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
I love how...
…“punch in the guy” is now a part of the GLB vocab now.
Have I mentioned that WG named his “guy” Skipper? So cute.
If I were a girl
I would name mine TheGrandSnatching.
"When the going gets tough... TheGrandHatching pops in later." -- WG
by TheGrandHatching on Nov 6, 2008 11:16 AM PST up reply actions 6 recs
Can it be deleted if its rec'd?
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
Rec'd by an admin at that.
"When the going gets tough... TheGrandHatching pops in later." -- WG
by TheGrandHatching on Nov 6, 2008 12:39 PM PST up reply actions
Lopez
www.PadsAndEnds.blogspot.com
"jbox does not drink coffee, as it makes him clean house big time." ~Kev
by TheThirdGonzalez on Nov 6, 2008 1:42 PM PST up reply actions
Regarding loyalty to players.
I don’t think it’s disloyal to hoffman or the padres by hoping he gets signed to a short contract. I think, as fans, we all want to remember those transcendant players in their prime.
Personally, I don’t like holding my breath for hoffman, knowing that he feasts on poor hitters, struggles mightly against good ones, and is good for one deep fly ball each outing. I want to remember him as the guy in 98 who would bounce his change-up in the dirt before home plate and STILL have hitters swinging at it.
It’s just no fun watching our idols hang on beyond their time.
Peavy
I own a Peavy jersey and I had long pined for the day when the Padres would star a truly home grown ace. I enjoyed every moment of his rise and I defended him at every turn when he was bothered by injuries.
But for some reason I don’t have a problem with him leaving. Partly, because its not a free agency thing where the Padres are just letting him walk for more money and because I have faith that any trade will bring back talent to the franchise. I also don’t think its because I’m choosing the team over the player. Sure I’ll always be a Padres fan, but that doesn’t make me want to dislike Jake as he heads out the door.
The best way I can describe it is that Jake is a hot, bright girl destined for bigger things. The Padres are the boyfriend. A struggling artist living in poverty that may eventually paint a masterpiece or two, but right now is forcing the girlfriend to eat top ramen and never takes her out on a real date. Sure they could make it big together, but she’s ready now so it’s time for the girlfriend to move on. Maybe it’ll even free up our struggling artist to work harder on crafting that masterpiece. Maybe some day the girl will make it big elsewhere and the boy’s first masterpiece will be painted and they’ll hook up again. But, if they don’t then at least they’ll know they were better off for it.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
Great
So Peavy leaves, and we sign the 38 year old washed up version of him in ten years. Meanwhile the artist dates a bunch of no-name skanks who throw nothing but slow straight fastballs, and we contract multiple STDs.
by Dalton on Nov 6, 2008 12:50 PM PST up reply actions 3 recs
Its hard to be a ‘fan’ when the owner has no regard for fans, players, or the city that grew his wallet (and divorce settlement). I love baseball, but I have not felt that the Padres front office cared a lick for fans since Larry Lucchino left. KT is a great guy, but he can only work within the framework of his budget. The jury is still out on Sandy (in my opinion) – I’m beginning to believe that he is like the Wall Street CEO group – making the statements that increase the perceived value of the product while participating with the owner in extracting every last cent until the day that they finally say “We’re bankrupt and need to sell the team”.
I’ll continue to cheer for the Padres, but until they field a competitive team, the only time they’ll get any of my hard EARNED income is when a team or player comes to town that I’m interested in. Does that mean that I’m a bad fan? Maybe – but this relationship has become too one sided to keep my interest.
A couple of things:
1)The city did not grow John Moore’s wallet. John Moores grew his own wallet by taking a risk and purchasing the real estate around the new stadium and hoping it would catch on. There was no guarantee that a downtown ballpark would revitalize the East Village the way that Petco has, and Moores took all the risk on that one, and appropriately deserves all the reward.
2) The citizens of San Diego voted to build the ballpark. Unnecessary protests and frivolous lawsuits delayed the construction of the stadium (which lawfully passed) and ballooned the price of the stadium to the City and the taxpayers. If people are pissed that Petco exists and raised their taxes, maybe they shouldn’t have voted for it.
3) I don’t follow the whole “the team doesn’t care about the fans” bit. We were back-to-back NL West champs. We had the best four seasons in team history from 2004 – 2007. The team was winning, the ballpark was beautiful, and the Padres had recaptured the interests of the City with whom they have such a difficult relationship. Now here’s a legitimate question: Over the past four years, which of our two professional franchises would you say cares more about the City and its fans? Would you say it’s the Padres who tried to assemble winning ballclubs and an enjoyable atmosphere? Would you say its the Chargers who have been more inconsistent than the Padres and have threatened to leave if their demands are not met?
There are times when your team is gonna suck. No team is awesome all the time. Hell, the Yankees didn’t make the playoffs for the first time in forever this year. I’m sure they have some depressed fans, but I doubt many people would accuse the team of not caring about them or not trying hard enough. Being a fan of a sports team means being a fan through the good times and the bad. It’s not always fun, but it makes it that much sweeter when the team actually succeeds. How do you think some of those Rays fans that have supported the team since day one felt when they made the playoffs this year? How do you think those same fans felt about the city that suddenly cared about the team when it had been neglected for years?
You can decide to do whatever you want. I’m not denying that my level of excitement is lower for next year than it was for this year. But that doesn’t mean I’m going to stop caring and that doesn’t mean that I’m giving up on them. I’ll always be a Padres fan before almost anything else in my life. Because, like they said in the ‘90s, when the team had some of its darkest years, "Hey, it’s baseball!"
"the owner has no regard for fans, players, or the city that grew his wallet"
John Moores first made his money by founding BMC Software in Texas in 1980 and cashed out about twice what the Padres are worth now, in stocks, when he left there ~20 years ago.
John Moores donates millions of those dollars to both Houston and San Diego every year, as well as to the Padres. (Note: an organization “extracting every last cent” does not require $14 million cash contributions)
Tony Gywnn says John Moores is the best owner in baseball.
Oh, and there’s this facility, the best baseball facility in the Dominican, which John Moores’ only motivation to do would be to get talented players in Padre uniforms.
I’m not an advocate for any rich people, but it’s pretty clear he has plenty of regard for all of those. Yes, it means that you are a bad fan when you only want to pay for a winner. See: fair-weather
Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you?
by Axion on Nov 6, 2008 3:02 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
They need to start broadcasting Angel games in San Diego.
I know there are contractual limits on these things, but still. Fans on the east coast have options. Fans in other cities have options.
The train runs right up the coast, and stops right at Angel stadium. They have an owner and front office that is all about the fans and the experience, not about saving a nickel here or there.
The only reason many of us stay loyal to the padres in the first place, is because it is the only game in town, as was said above .. it’s baseball.
Give us options, and I guarantee you the padres wouldn’t draw 10,000 a game. Nobody wants to watch that crap. 2-1 games every night, sitting around waiting 8 inning for Hells Bells. It gets old.
and then when you finally do get a star player here, the front office lies to him and the fans .. routinely.
Jakes moving on, is going to be the last straw for a number of fans.
Personally, i haven’t followed the Chargers since Seau and Harrison left. Since the owner starting holding practices in LA. He lost me as a fan then, and I have never been back. I haven’t given a dime, not one, and they had some good years since, and i still didn’t care, or watch.
The padres are dangerously close to that now for me anyways…
Does that make me un-loyal, maybe so. But i was an Angel fan as a kid, before moving to San Diego .. i support this team, ’cus it is baseball.
not anymore, thanks to the internet, and mlb.tv . I have options. I have no problems watching angel games versus padre games. they are on at the same time, and i can be at the park in an hour.
i just wished they would lift the blackout on FSW ..
go padres!
by wrveres on Nov 6, 2008 10:56 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
















