"You don't really want to deal with people who handle their business that way... To come home and to hear the comments, and hear how they're spinning lies to do damage control, I feel like I have to stand up and set the record straight a little bit, and say how things happened."
12 months ago
Drama
83 comments
0 recs |
Comments
This whole mess just keeps getting sadder by the day.
www.PadsAndEnds.blogspot.com
"jbox does not drink coffee, as it makes him clean house big time." ~Kev
by TheThirdGonzalez on Nov 14, 2008 8:24 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Looks like Alderson was caught in another lie.
Do you know what we get to do today? We get to talk baseball!
www.websoulsurfer.com
by websoulsurfer on Nov 14, 2008 8:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
'tec4 is gonna be all over you.
www.PadsAndEnds.blogspot.com
"jbox does not drink coffee, as it makes him clean house big time." ~Kev
by TheThirdGonzalez on Nov 14, 2008 8:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll bet
you couldn’t name one “lie” Alderson has told.
Ron Rivera. Change we can believe in. YES WE CAN!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Nov 14, 2008 8:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Still kissing Alderson's behind I see
You have your head seriously far up his behind. Taking a look at his prostate I take it.
Do you know what we get to do today? We get to talk baseball!
www.websoulsurfer.com
by websoulsurfer on Nov 14, 2008 9:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't change the subject.
Ron Rivera. Change we can believe in. YES WE CAN!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Nov 14, 2008 9:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Your anal fetish for Alderson IS the subject
It doesn’t matter what reality may be or what he may have said, you don’t want to believe he has done anything wrong.
That IS the subject.
Do you know what we get to do today? We get to talk baseball!
www.websoulsurfer.com
by websoulsurfer on Nov 14, 2008 9:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Silly me.
I completely forgot that agreeing with someone was synonymous with analingus. I’ll have to remember that.
www.PadsAndEnds.blogspot.com
"jbox does not drink coffee, as it makes him clean house big time." ~Kev
by TheThirdGonzalez on Nov 14, 2008 9:55 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
So
you can’t name one then?
Ron Rivera. Change we can believe in. YES WE CAN!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Nov 14, 2008 9:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's what I thought
Ron Rivera. Change we can believe in. YES WE CAN!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Nov 15, 2008 8:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Looks like Hoffman's agent has been feeding Trevor lies
So that Trevor won’t try to take less money with the Padres.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 14, 2008 8:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Looks like Thurman was caught in another lie.
Ron Rivera. Change we can believe in. YES WE CAN!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Nov 14, 2008 8:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah the big bad meanie
Trevor Hoffman.. out to screw the people of San Diego ..
what ever ..
552
by wrveres on Nov 14, 2008 9:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Trevor Hoffman=Rick Thurman?
Interesting…
Ron Rivera. Change we can believe in. YES WE CAN!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Nov 14, 2008 9:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hoffman just said they were lying
and yet you still find no fault in the way this front office handled this situation ..?
classic.
552
by wrveres on Nov 14, 2008 9:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Excuse me
But Trevor is whining about learning contract negotiation stuff through the internet. Which is his agent’s doing, not the Padres. The Padres had to scramble after the agent leaked all the contract information. He also says
“It was never their intention to honor [the offer],” said Hoffman. “And they didn’t have the strength to stand up and do that the right way.”
Which is pure conjecture on his part. He doesn’t know any better than we do as to whether they would have honored the deal. To me it looks like Trevor is getting jerked around by both his agent and the Padres. The Padres can’t afford to pay market value for a reliever on the downside of his career and the agent doesn’t to take anything less than the max offer, damn the consequences. Which means the fans suffer and Trevor is mostly innocent. However, just because Trevor thinks the Padres lied, doesn’t mean that they actually did.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 14, 2008 11:48 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
scramble how
you mean cover their ass?
Hoffman asked for a meeting to discuss his long term future with the padres, and they denied him that. Period. You can spin it how ever you want, but that is a fact.
Hoffman said he was getting ready to take the offer. And again, why did the front office demand this be private? and who the hell are they to demand such things? Offers hit the AP everyday this time of year. Why did this front office think they needed to be so top secret about it, and then the public anger about the contract hitting the press? wha what?
They wanted to control the media on this, thats why. They didn’t want him back, plain and simple.
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 12:24 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
YOU'RE WRONG
1. They said they’d be glad to have a meeting with him, sans John Moores.
2. The FO and Trevor Hoffman had agreed earlier to keep it quiet in order to move things along quickly before the free agent signing period.
3. They are the people who sign his paycheck, that’s who the hell they are.
4. I already addressed why it was supposed to be quiet
5. “They wanted to control the media on this, thats why”- Who are you, a GOP conspiracy theorist?
6. “They didn’t want him back, plain and simple.”- and now you are a mind reader?
Please put at least a little thought into your posts next time.
Ron Rivera. Change we can believe in. YES WE CAN!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Nov 15, 2008 12:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
check your facts
1. The front office is saying they would be glad to have a meeting with him NOW. After the nightmare. You bet your ass they are willing to meet with him NOW. They look like idiots.
2. Again, the front office told you this. Kevin towers and Alderson. I don’t remember Trevor Hoffman saying this. Just the front office.
3. This is not the idiot short stop that slammed his hand into the locker. This is a friggin franchise icon you are dealing with, fool.
4. so, you just included it to show you could count to six?
5. & 6. are just dumb. And then you said, put some thought into .. classic. Like yo did with your little counting exercise i guess.
And since when are the padres run like the Gustapo?
Two years ago they were giving rides home in the company plane to Junior, after he beat us. Now the franchise icon can’t even get a sit down. Gets released via fax?
bull chit.
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 1:10 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Like I was saying
It’s he said she said. If you choose to believe the FO you trust a biased side, if you choose to believe Hoffman’s agents or Hoffman’s comments that are most likely biased by his agents’ spin the you also have a biased view. I choose to believe that the professionalism was mostly there and both sides have made it ugly afterwords because neither really wanted to be together and neither wants to look bad doing it. But, guess what? They both look bad, cuz they are acting like childish aholes.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 15, 2008 1:49 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
we should all pitch in.
and get them a table for four at the Prado.
Towers
Hoffman
Peavy
Alderson
then they can settle this like the friars of yesteryear. over wine.
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 2:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Judging how things have gone so far
Hoffman’s agent would stumble in sloppy drunk and try to make out with Hoffman just to sabotage the whole thing.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 15, 2008 2:03 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
so hoffmans agent is a sloppy drunk?
are you trying to slime the guy to help you feel better about your opinion?
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 2:07 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Yes
Hoffman’s agent is a sloppy drunk. That is exactly what I’m saying.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 15, 2008 2:09 AM PST up reply actions 7 recs
Right over your head
Ron Rivera. Change we can believe in. YES WE CAN!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Nov 15, 2008 10:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Some facts for you.
How it appears to have gone down:
KT(not SA): Faxed offer of $4 million with no incentives and an option year with no buyout to Thurman on October 10th – 1st reported in Media on October 16th during interview with Kevin Towers. What happened to negotiations being private?
Offers cannot be officially accepted until 1 day after end of World Series. Game 5 was completed on October 29th.
Hoffman: Nothing new to report on Oct 18th.
Padres: News leaked to media of amount and length of offer to Hoffman. Attributed to “source within the Padres organization with knowledge of the negotiations”. October 22nd.
Hoffman: Instructed Rick Thurman to Request meeting with Moores, Alderson and Towers. (1st reported by media outlets on Nov 4th as having happened on October 24th.)
Thurman: Expresses disappointment that Padres have not responded in any way to request for a meeting with Hoffman. The interview in which this was revealed was by Krasovic on Nov. 6th.
Towers: When asked about Thurman’s comments, General Manager Kevin Towers said, "I left Hoffman a voicemail message last week on his cell about Sandy and I being accessible to meet with him, although we couldn’t guarantee John Moores’ presence due to him more than likely being out of town." Nov. 6th. (Hoffman was in Puerto Rico at the time.)
Padres FO: Notify Thurman in a fax that they have withdrawn offer.
Hoffman: After being notified by his agent, Hoffman calls Towers November 10th. Is told negotiations are over. This has apparently been confirmed by Peavy, Young and others who were with Hoffman in Puerto Rico.
Alderson: Tries to spin one of the worst PR blunders in Padres history. Fails miserably. November 11th.
Do you know what we get to do today? We get to talk baseball!
www.websoulsurfer.com
by websoulsurfer on Nov 16, 2008 3:35 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i'd still like to know how they "Scrambled"
and why did they feel the need to scramble?
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 1:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They scrambled by discussing things in the media
Sandy Alderson talked about the negotiations only after the agent leaked the contract details. Before that, the company line was that they wanted Trevor back. They had to scramble because the agent was trying to make the Padres look bad in order to gain leverage, so they were trying to get the upper hand back, but really never did.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 15, 2008 1:51 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
but there were no negotiations
the padres offered.
hoffman replied, let meet about a week later.
then silence
and more silence
and then a leak, that if i remember correctly was attributed to the padres, not to the agent ..
and then the offer was pulled, don’t let the door hit ya on the way out.
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 1:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why do you just take what people say
And then say the opposite? The Padres wanted to keep the negotiations quiet. Why would they want to leak a low ball offer?
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 15, 2008 1:58 AM PST up reply actions 3 recs
your assuming
it was somebody high up in the front office.
anybody could have leaked it. You can rest assured that the UT was calling anybody and everybody they knew for weeks, trying to find out the contract info.
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 2:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess
But the UT wasn’t the first reporter on that one. The AP was. If the UT had the scoop, I suspect they’d try to get it their paper first.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 15, 2008 2:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
once again.
its a contract offer to a baseball player. Not nuclear launch codes. these things are in the paper every day. The only people who wanted it private was the friars. why?
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 2:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Like DePodesta said
Any inclination that the Padres wouldn’t keep Trevor would make them look bad. These are business negotiations where you want to get the best deal for your side, and if the media knew what sort of offers and ploys you were trying, they would spin it such that you didn’t want the fan favorite. These are the main reasons why the Padres would want it quiet.
If I were thinking like the player agent and I wanted as much money as possible, I would worry that my client might sign with the sentimental choice for less money and the more I could spark controversy, the better chance my client would go to the open market and take the biggest money offer and get me the most money.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 15, 2008 2:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Right
irregardless of his clients life long wishes to finish his career as a padre. This agent decided he could make an extra $25,000, if he could drive a wedge between his client and the padres.
you know what?
i am not buying it.
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 2:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
come to think of it.
that might be an ethics violation.
Hoffman’s agent sabotaged his clients 17 year career, for 25 grand.
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 2:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, I don't believe in altruistic agents/lawyers.
Why would the agent care about the client’s life long wishes if he gets extra money on the client’s last contract? It’s not like the agent will have to deal with any consequences to that.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 15, 2008 2:24 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
a lack of future clients
is consequences my friend.
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 2:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Scott Boras
Goes for money over feelings all the time and has no shortage of clients.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 15, 2008 2:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yes but his clients know this and are behind it all the way.
Trevor wanted to retire a padre. juuust a little different, wouldn’t you say?
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 2:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not really
The bottom line is that Trevor will most likely sign for more money than he could get from the Padres. That is a situation that works out in favor of the agent. It might be naive to to think that the agent didn’t have something to do with that.
Yes. Hoffman’s agent is a sloppy drunk. That is exactly what I’m saying.
by Wonko on Nov 15, 2008 2:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
and somebody called ME the conspiracy theorist.
as I said above, I am not buying it.
I am not buying that this agent decided to go against his clients wishes. So he sabotaged the relationship, to make an extra 25 grand, one last time .. agree to disagree ..
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 2:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not a conspiracy
It’s business.
Yes. Hoffman’s agent is a sloppy drunk. That is exactly what I’m saying.
by Wonko on Nov 15, 2008 2:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
let me also just interject here...
and say thanks for keeping this debate civil. honestly.
by Dex on Nov 15, 2008 7:24 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
dex
just to be clear. I am not angry or upset. I am certainly not trying to pick a fight unlike that suarez poster.
i came in here to have a discussion, nothing more, and apparently that is either foreign to some people, or based up the responses in most threads, frowned upon.
its like mission bay’s very own deadspin or something.
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 5:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So what you are saying is
You ARE a mind reader?
Ron Rivera. Change we can believe in. YES WE CAN!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Nov 15, 2008 9:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In this case
you have Thurman the agent and Alderson the lawyer. The best of both worlds.
by jbox on Nov 15, 2008 10:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I love when people use irregardless
Reminds me of Ben Affleck in Good Will Hunting.
by Winfield's Ghost on Nov 15, 2008 8:14 AM PST up reply actions 5 recs
yeah i agree
so not a word
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
by justdave on Nov 15, 2008 4:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hoffman signed for $4 million less than the Padres offer 3 years earlier
Why would his agent sabotage the negotiations on a much smaller contract now against the express wishes of his client?
That just makes absolutely NO sense.
Do you know what we get to do today? We get to talk baseball!
www.websoulsurfer.com
by websoulsurfer on Nov 16, 2008 3:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you'll have to scan up to see what i'm replying to...
but this comment wins the black pot award for the week.
by Dex on Nov 15, 2008 7:23 AM PST up reply actions 9 recs
I would rec this about a million times if I could
That really, really made me laugh.
by Winfield's Ghost on Nov 15, 2008 8:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"...according to a Padres source with knowledge of the negotiations"
On October 22nd that was the line that followed:
The San Diego Padres offered closer Trevor Hoffman a $4 million deal with an option for 2010…
It was the PADRES that leaked the amount and terms initially, not Thurman.
Do you know what we get to do today? We get to talk baseball!
www.websoulsurfer.com
by websoulsurfer on Nov 16, 2008 3:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Braaaaaaaaaack. Wrong answer, but thanks for playing.
On October 22nd the amount and terms of the contract were leaked by “source within the Padres organization with knowledge of the negotiations” according to reports on several media outlets.
Do you know what we get to do today? We get to talk baseball!
www.websoulsurfer.com
by websoulsurfer on Nov 16, 2008 3:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Right
Because “source within the Padres organization with knowledge of the negotiations” is so specific. And we all know the media is so accurate with their reporting and sources when it comes to the hot stove season. How many reports go around with the tag “from a source within the organization” that has some insider source that ends up being completely bogus. That source from within the organization could easily have been Thurman making some phone calls.
I am not totally onboard with the idea of Hoffy’s agent sabotaging things, but unfortunately it is just about as reasonable as anything else at this point.
I still hold to the idea that Towers, Peavy, and now Hoffman, and their agents are all in on this. They are just setting everyone up to think that the Padres have already given up on the season, and then with a few key Towers Trades™, and a couple FA signings, we will win this division with nobody expecting it.
by osbug on Nov 17, 2008 7:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Here is a little reality for you and Sandy Alderson aka SDSUAztec4
How it appears to have gone down:
KT(not SA): Faxed offer of $4 million with no incentives and an option year with no buyout to Thurman on October 10th – 1st reported in Media on October 16th during interview with Kevin Towers. What happened to negotiations being private?
Offers cannot be officially accepted until 1 day after end of World Series. Game 5 was completed on October 29th.
Hoffman: Nothing new to report on Oct 18th.
Padres: News leaked to media of amount and length of offer to Hoffman. Attributed to “source within the Padres organization with knowledge of the negotiations”. October 22nd.
Hoffman: Instructed Rick Thurman to Request meeting with Moores, Alderson and Towers. (1st reported by media outlets on Nov 4th as having happened on October 24th.)
Thurman: Expresses disappointment that Padres have not responded in any way to request for a meeting with Hoffman. The interview in which this was revealed was by Krasovic on Nov. 6th.
Towers: When asked about Thurman’s comments, General Manager Kevin Towers said, "I left Hoffman a voicemail message last week on his cell about Sandy and I being accessible to meet with him, although we couldn’t guarantee John Moores’ presence due to him more than likely being out of town." Nov. 6th. (Hoffman was in Puerto Rico at the time.)
Padres FO: Notify Thurman in a fax that they have withdrawn offer.
Hoffman: After being notified by his agent, Hoffman calls Towers November 10th. Is told negotiations are over. This has apparently been confirmed by Peavy, Young and others who were with Hoffman in Puerto Rico.
Alderson: Tries to spin one of the worst PR blunders in Padres history. Fails miserably. November 11th.
Do you know what we get to do today? We get to talk baseball!
www.websoulsurfer.com
by websoulsurfer on Nov 16, 2008 3:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i dont' care who was at fault.
The way this front office is treating a San Diego legend is disgraceful. Props to you guys, for pissing off 95% of your fanbase, and alienatiting your greatest asset. I think what they should do is give themselves all promotions and raises.
no way in hell the padres are “BETTER” because of this crap ..
fools
552
by wrveres on Nov 14, 2008 9:52 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
The best way to maintain a fan base is to build a winner
That’s been studied and proven multiple times. Despite how the fan base feels at this moment it really has no relevance on the future of the Padres if they go one to win as quickly as they can. The Padres lost 99 games with these guys and if they brought them all back and did it again the fans would still feel alienated. I know you are very angry, but my best advice is to calm down and let this all happen. They have a plan and it’s probably best to see what happens. The spamming of anti-FO posts just makes it seem like you have a one-track mind and are angry for the sake of being angry, when really we here to chat about the Padres.
Homer: Ohhhh, The Denver Broncos.
Marge: Whats wrong with the Denver Broncos?
Homer: Marge you just don't understand football.
by Wonko on Nov 15, 2008 1:57 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
If you paid attention last season
A big chunk of the fanbase was calling for Trevor’s retirement. Somehow I doubt they pissed off 95% of their fanbase. Maybe annoyed some people, but I don’t think Trevor’s side comes out innocent in this.
Anyone notice that it seems to be the GLB vets siding more with the FO on this, and the newer guys bashing the FO? Probably statistically insignificant, but interesting nonetheless.
by osbug on Nov 15, 2008 9:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dex and jbox
Could we have another ban Monday? The first time around, I didn’t ban anyone.
But things have changed.
by Winfield's Ghost on Nov 15, 2008 6:21 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
While I will agree that Rick Thurman didn't help the situation at all...
…this mess still falls on the Padres front office. The Padres say they wanted Trevor Hoffman back for the ‘09 season. So just based on that, if they thought the agent was dicking around with them…why not wait until Trevor got back to San Diego to have a face-to-face meeting including Sandy, KT, Trevor and his agent to attempt to work it out? Why not be 100% sure that it wasn’t Trevor, and in fact his agent, jerking them around? Wasn’t it worth it in this situation to cover all your bases? What is so hard about that? Instead of pulling the offer via fax and then having KT call Trevor to tell him it was over?
This can only mean one of two things:
1. They really had no intention of bringing Trevor back to begin with.
2. They ended a 16-year, Hall of Fame career with the Padres because they were angry with the way his agent was handling their first contract offer.
In the first case, they’re liars. In the second case, assholes. To be frank, I think they’re both.
Hell's Bells will ring no more in Petco Park.
by Drama on Nov 15, 2008 8:39 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
I don't think Thurman
would allow the FO to talk to Trevor directly, in fact it was reported that the one time KT contacted Trevor directly, Thurman was pissed.
Ron Rivera. Change we can believe in. YES WE CAN!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Nov 15, 2008 9:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So...
Sandy Alderson was scared of pissing off Rick Thurman? Seriously?
Hell's Bells will ring no more in Petco Park.
by Drama on Nov 15, 2008 9:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well
Thurman obviously has enormous sway with Trevor. Since Sandy would be dealing with Thurman 99% of the time, it kind of behooves him not to piss him off. But that’s not the point. The point is that this situation isn’t as simple as you are making it out to be.
Ron Rivera. Change we can believe in. YES WE CAN!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Nov 15, 2008 9:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But it could have been.
Unless you’re from the Sandy School of Thinking which is to make it as difficult as possible and then get offended when someone has a different view or opinion.
Hell's Bells will ring no more in Petco Park.
by Drama on Nov 15, 2008 11:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
The guy who complicated this is Rick Thurman, who has the ONLY incentive to complicate this, in that he gets a bigger cut if Trevor gets a bigger contract.
Ron Rivera. Change we can believe in. YES WE CAN!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Nov 15, 2008 11:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So
What you’re saying is that the Padres are going to allow this over some jerk-off agent? They’re that inept?
Hell's Bells will ring no more in Petco Park.
by Drama on Nov 15, 2008 11:22 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
No
What I’m saying is, Trevor left his jerk-off agent in charge while he was in Puerto Rico, and he effed S up.
Ron Rivera. Change we can believe in. YES WE CAN!
by Sam (sdsuaztec4) on Nov 15, 2008 3:44 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
that is also how i read things
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
by justdave on Nov 15, 2008 4:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Where exactly did you read that?
Because that was never reported in the UT, North County Times, ESPN, CBS Sportsline, Fox Sports, The Sporting News, Sports Illustrated or any other media source I could look up on Lexus Nexus.
In fact Towers said he only left a message on Trevor’s voicemail on his cell. He never even spoke to him unti Trevor called him on November 10th.
Are you trying to be like your hero/alter ego Alderson?
Do you know what we get to do today? We get to talk baseball!
www.websoulsurfer.com
by websoulsurfer on Nov 16, 2008 3:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
this whole notion
that this agent purposely screwed up the talks, so that he could make another dime, against his clients publicly stated career wishes, is bull, and i think the people spewing it know this.
The 9-11 conspiracy theorists have more evidence. The only “Evidence” you have of this is “Sandy Alderson said”, and of course therefore it must be true, apparently. Never mind, this is the same guy demanded the offer be kept private, and the same guy that was angered and embarrassed when it became public. Yeah he was working on the up and up all right….
but what he says is gospel, and Trevor is the liar. wow.
what a piece of work you guy are.
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 4:21 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
i dont think anyones saying trevor is a liar
trevor could go 0-50 on save opportunities for us and i’d be telling ppl to give him another chance.
the way i read things is that his agent is trying to be douchy, and the FO is cooperating with him, all while trevor was gone on vacation.
i think its just a crappy situation.
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
by justdave on Nov 15, 2008 4:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
oh dave ..
apparently he can take routine shots at me, and its ok..
i am here trying to have a discussion about this subject with padre fans, and am being called spammer, and an angry troll among other things. nevermind that i am actually discussing it, and nevermind that half the people in this thread just posted a bunch of one line zingers. I am the spammer with no life..
whatever…
this place is not for me. apparently you guys have your little boys club, with your secret handshakes, and any attempt to have a discussion with them is a waste of time.
552
by wrveres on Nov 15, 2008 4:44 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
i think everyones just bitter about the situation...
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
by justdave on Nov 15, 2008 5:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
but i do love one line zingers.
its kinda what i do here.
www.wellbelowthemendozaline.blogspot.com
by justdave on Nov 15, 2008 5:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Personally, I agree with you
I have no idea how people can defend this organization right now. These are the same people that literally said, “If the crowd starts to boo, we’ll just turn up the music”.
by Dex on Nov 15, 2008 5:46 PM PST up reply actions 3 recs
Peace
Isaac Brock is my Morrissey
by CurbEnthusiasm on Nov 15, 2008 8:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
May I ask you to reconsider?
…I see. Well, of course, this is just the sort of blinkered philistine pig-ignorance I’ve come to expect from you non-creative garbage. You sit there on your loathsome spotty behinds squeezing blackheads, not caring a tinker’s cuss for the struggling artist. You excrement, you whining hypocritical toadies with your color TV sets and your Tony Jacklin golf clubs and your bleeding masonic secret handshakes. You wouldn’t let me join, would you, you blackballing bastards. Well I wouldn’t become a Freemason now if you went down on your lousy stinking knees and begged me.

"When the going gets tough... TheGrandHatching pops in later." -- WG
by TheGrandHatching on Nov 17, 2008 7:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
















