Recovering from injury quicker is cheating. Pettitte and Vina should not be let off the hook
Let me give you a "what if". What if there was something unnatural that allowed a boxer to recover from injuries in such a fashion as to be back at 100%, not from one match to the next, but from one round to the next? The end of round three rolls around. Before round four, the boxer is injected with something and, lo and behold, the injuries have miraculously disappeared, and that fighter can continue in tip-top shape in the next round.
Is that an unfair advantage?
Let me give you another "what if". What if there was something unnatural a Tour De France cyclist could do so that he wasn't as tired from one stage to the next and his muscles could recover that much quicker so that he's as close to 100% every single day of the race.
That sounds a lot like an unfair advantage.
People describe the baseball season as a "marathon" and part of a marathon is having the endurance and physical makeup to not have your body fail over the course of the competition. We, as fans, know that one game is just one game. It's the bigger picture that's important. Some guys are made to stay healthy and be strong at the end. Some guys aren't. That's part of the game.
Pettitte and Vina are trying to make it sound like they were being so unselfish for taking performance enhancers. They were doing it so they could get back to playing quicker after injury. As if injury were an unnatural thing and therefore they should be allowed to do something unnatural. They were doing it for their team, therefore, they aren't as bad as people doing it to hit more home runs.
I call hogwash. Injuries may happen because of freak accident or they may happen because you're not conditioned properly. Regardless of which, they're part of the game. For pitchers especially, part of the strategy from game to game is saving relievers or seeing how long your starter can go without potentially wearing himself out for his next start. Quicker recovery through banned substances is just as bad as more home runs through banned substances.
The morals of the story.
- Even if you were just trying to recover from an injury quicker, you were still cheating.
- Gaining an unfair advantage for your team is still gaining an unfair advantage.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't think they were making excuses
I'm not saying that's exactly how it was...but it's certainly not an impossible scenario.
They caved to peer pressure and now feel horrible about it.
Obviously, the other side could be that they were as doped up as Brad Pitt in True Romance.
Right, but...
I guess what bugs me is that this is going to be a standard line for these guys and to me, they're admitting to doing something that's just as bad as if they said, "I tried it for two days to see if I could hit more home runs". There's nothing unselfish about what either guy was attempting to do.
I think they feel horrible that they got caught.
On another note, when Wolverine was bare-knuckle brawling in the X-Men movie, does his natural, albeit mutant, ability count as cheating?
pettite's apology says it all....
everything about this pisses me off. When you are apologizing you don't say "IF what i did was wrong" you say "what i did was wrong". this is like saying in his eyes he didn't do anything wrong but if America thinks he did then he is sorry. Really an immature apology. He also says I accept responsibility "FOR THOSE TWO DAYS", really smacks of sarcasm. As if adding on that it was only two days makes it not as big a deal. "If robbing the bank was an error in judgment than i apologize for that 500 dollars i took". Just trying to get him self off the hook and not accepting full responsibility and admitting that he was wrong and cheated.
Once a bank robber, always a bank robber
Agree 100%
Isn't it ironic how Jose Canseco comes off looking better after all this? Vindication!
I agree
It's kind of like if you had a cool professor or TA in college that didn't take his/her job too seriously and gave you easy tests or looked the other way if you had notes or shared answers. The teacher created the environment and the students just followed. Yeah, they're wrong for cheating...but the bigger culprit is the teacher for allowing it.
MLB allowed drug use. Players took them. Can you really blame them? If organizations were basically expecting players to compete at higher levels and were at the very least condoning the behavior (and I bet in many cases encouraging it)...can you really blame the player? If he doesn't go along, he's out of a job. If he goes along, he keeps his job and really has no fear of being outed (until now).
I am pissed at a guy like Clemens though who continues to use the old company line. At least guys like Pettite, Roberts and Vina came out and admitted it.
Why stop there...
There are degrees of difficulty and peer pressure throughout life but take responsibility for your lives and then take responsibility for your OWN decisions and actions, period!
Also, cups
Gloves
by Boilermaker19 on Dec 19, 2007 10:58 AM PST up reply actions
Five fingers
by Gone Savage on Dec 19, 2007 12:05 PM PST up reply actions
Bats
I agree
An umpire verbally abusing a player while he is on the basepath, until the player snaps, goes and confronts the umpire, then for some strange reason, the manager grabs the player, spins him around and jumps on his back...making his knee explode.
If something that strange would ever happen, I think the player can get a freebie.

by 












