Pads: Making the Grade?

by jbox on Apr 28, 2005 4:17 PM PDT in News

I was trying to grade all the regular players so far this season. A = excellent, B = good, C = Average, D = Needs improvement, F = Failing.

I graded them based on if they are achieving in the role that they are expected to fill.

I welcome any changes or suggestions. It was actually kinda hard handing out these grades. I'm just trying to get a better idea of how these dudes are doing individually.

I tried to be fair, but sometimes I'm not

53 Adam Eaton        B
51 Trevor Hoffman    B
50 Brian Lawrence    C-
38 Scott Linebrink    B-
16 Akinori Otsuka    C+
44 Jake Peavy        A
39 Tim Redding        D
49 Dennys Reyes        B
37 Rudy Seanez        B
17 Woody Williams    B+
55 Ramon Hernandez    B-
27 Geoff Blum         B+
33 Sean Burroughs    C+
8 Mark Loretta        B+
23 Phil Nevin         C-
24 Brian Giles        C-
30 Ryan Klesko        C
22 Xavier Nady        B
10 Dave Roberts        A-
11 Mark Sweeney        B+
Bruce Bochy        C+
John Moores        D

Tweet Comment 2 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

I know you asked me about this before

...And I didn't help much then, but here's some questions. Shouldn't Redding be getting an F at this point? I don't think he should even get a chance to try to improve. At least not as a starter for this team. And I know we argue about this all the time, but how is Bruce Bochy better than the average manager? What evidence is there that he's anything but below average? I also think you're hard on Moores. He did pull a little bit of a coup with the hiring of Sandy Alderson. I'd much rather have Moores than an owner who refuses to spend any money at all.

by Dex on Apr 28, 2005 4:28 PM PDT reply actions

I'm open to suggestions...

Throw out some grades for these guys. Redding = F. I was just thinking that he does okay at points in games. Usually the first couple innings then he flounders.

by jbox on Apr 28, 2005 4:40 PM PDT reply actions